Award No. 13277
Docket No. TE-10992
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
Francis M. Reagan, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
THE ORDER OF RAILROAD TELEGRAPHERS
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The
Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Lekdgh Valley Railroad that,
1. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties hereto
when on Monday, September 2, 1957 (Labor Day) it blanked the
Agent-Telegrapher position at Clifton Springs, N.Y.
2. Carrier shall compensate William Peisher, regular occupant
of the Agent-Telegrapher position at Clifton Springs, for eight hours
at time and one-half the hourly rate of the Clifton Springs AgentTelegrapher position, to cover Monday, September 2, 1957.
3. Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties hereto
when on Thursday, November 28, 1957 (Thanksgiving Day) it
blanked the Agent-Telegrapher position at Clifton Springs, New
York, and resultantly failed to pay William Peisher for that holiday
in accordance with Agreement rules.
4. Carrier shall compensate William Peisher, regular occupant
of the Clifton Springs Agent-Telegrapher position for eight hours
at time and one-half the hourly rate of the Clifton Springs position
to cover Thursday, (Thanksgiving Day), November 28, 1957.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT Oh' FACTS: There is in full force and
effect a collective bargaining agreement entered into by and between Lehigh
Valley Railroad Company, hereafter referred to as Carrier or Management
and The Order of Railroad Telegraphers, hereinafter referred to as Employes
or Telegraphers. The schedule agreement was effective February 1, 1948 and
has been amended. The agreement as amended is on file with this Division
and is by reference made a part of this submission as though set out herein
word for word.
The disputes submitted herein were handled separately on the
property in the usual manner through the highest officer designated by the
[7147
13277-25
738
Claimants each received one day's pay at straight time for the holiday not worked.
"There is nothing in the agreement which requires the carrier
to work regularly assigned employes on holidays when their services
are not needed.
"The purpose of the holiday rule was to give a regularly assigned
employe a holiday without a loss of take-home pay. Such was
realized here.
"Claim denied." (Emphasis ours.)
In conclusion, Carrier urges that under the current agreement it was
within its rights blanking claimant's position on the two holidays involved in
this dispute. He was paid for the holiday pay the existing rule provides.
There was no violation of the agreement when the position was blanked on
Labor Day and Thanksgiving Day in 1957, and the take-home pay of claimant
was not affected in any way by blanking those holidays.
OPINION OF BOARD:
Claim was made that the Carrier violated the
Agreement when it blanked the Agent-Telegrapher position at Clifton
Springs, New York on Monday, September 2, 1957 (Labor Day) and Thursday, November 28, 1957 (Thanksgiving Day).
The agreed to facts are:
1. William Peisher, Agent-Telegrapher, is the owner of this assignment,
a seven day position.
2. His regular assigned workdays are Thursday, Friday, Saturday,
Sunday, and Monday, and assigned rest days are Tuesday and Wednesday
of each week.
3. He did not work Monday, September 2, 1957 or Thursday, November
28, 1957 but was paid 8 hours at the straight rate for each date.
4. He now asks to be paid an additional eight hours for each day at
the time and one-half the hourly rate.
The question presented is: "Has the Claimant a demand right to work
his regular assignment on September 2, 1957 (Labor Day) and November 28,
1957 (Thanksgiving Day) and thus receive penalty pay or may the Carrier
blank the position and discharge its obligation to Claimant by paying him
holiday pay while not working him?"
Contention is made by the Claimant that Carrier in blanking the position
on the day in question violated:
"Rule 11-Guarantee-Suspension From Work
"(a) A regularly assigned employe shall receive one day's pay
within each twenty-four (24) hour period, according to position occupied or to which entitled, if ready for service and not used, or if
required on duty less than eight (8) hours on his position, except on
his rest days when occupying positions covered by Section 1 (d) ~f
13277-26
739
Rule 7, or on his rest days and holidays when occupying positions
covered by Section 1, (b) and (c) of Rule 7.
"(b) Employes will not be required to suspend work during
regular hours or to absorb overtime."
"Rule 7-Rest Days, Relief Assignments and Holiday Service
"Section 1. (d) Seven-day Positions
"On positions which have been filled seven days per week, any
two consecutive days may be the rest days with the presumption in
favor of Saturday and Sunday."
asserting that the only exception to non-payment permitted under this rule
is "on his rest days only".
That the Carrier has the right to blank these holidays has been established by this Board. Confirm Awards 8539 (Coburn) and 9474 (Grady) and
others.
Accordingly, Rule 11 cited is a guarantee to employes "ready for service
and not used" of a full pay check not a guarantee Carrier will provide them
with work.
Award 7136 (Carter) quoted Second Division Award No. 1606 as follows:
"To us their agreement means in respect to working employes
on holidays, the Carrier has two alternatives: it may work them or
it may not. If it chooses the former alternative, it incurs a penalty in
the form of paying time and one-half rate for the holiday hours
worked."
and provided:
"The above most certainly means that if the Carrier elects to not
work the employe, there is no obligation to pay the man anything
other than what he might be entitled to as holiday pay under the
August 21, 1954 Agreement."
Claimant has been paid that to which he is entitled-holiday pay at the
straight time rate. Conform Award No. 10594 (Hall) and 11253 (Miller).
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively
Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as
approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement has not been violated.
13277-27
7 40
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at
Chicago, Illinois, this 10th
day of February 1966.