THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Southern Railway, that:



EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The following diagram is given to show the general area of the occurrence of this violation:





                                (John Sevier)


earrlman Jet. Blair Ctincon Knoxville
51.3 41.5 20.9 0.0

2278

'Blair, Tennessee, as shown above, is 41.6 miles west of Knoxville, which includes John Sevier Yard. Claimant E. L. Miller was the agent-telegrapher

                  [8387

13342--11 848

Carrier has shown that no work of handling orders, belong to operators under Rule 31, was performed at Blair on the night in question, that such work was performed by the operator on duty at Clinton, and that there was no violation of the agreement. For the reasons set forth herein, carrier respectfully requests that the claim be denied.


    (Exhibits not reproduced.)


OPINION OF BOARD: Train Extra 4150-4186 West was called to make a trip from John Sevier, Tennessee, to Blair, Tennessee, and return to John Sevier. Upon arrival of Extra 4150 at Clinton, Train Order 90 was delivered to a member of Train Extra 4150.


    Train Order No. 86 is as follows:


"FORM 19 Train Order No. 86 December 20, 1959 FORM 19
To: C&E Eng. 4186 at Blair At: Clinton
c/o Extra 4150 West

    After Extra 4150 West arrives at Blair, Engine 4186 run extra Blair to Clinton. No. 51 fifty one is by Blair.

                            W 0 C

    Made: Complete Time: 8:06 P. M. Jayne -Opr."


    Train Order No. 90 is as follows:


"FORM 19 Train Order No. 90 December 20, 1959 FORM 19

    To: C&E Extra 4186 East at Blair At: Clinton

    c/o Extra 4150 West


    No. 27 twenty seven and No. 153 one fifty three wait at East Siding until 1059 ten fifty nine P. M., Laurel until 11:15 eleven fifteen P. M. for 2 two Extras 4186 and 2278 East.

                          WOC

    Made: Complete Time: 8:36 P. M. Jayne -Opr."


Note that 4186 and 4150 are coupled in the same train. This order is directed to the same crew, with the same A units and on a continuous run. There is no real difference between the run of this train on a turn around and a straight line run.


Where the same crew continuously operates the same power units there is no "handling" of train orders where only the train's designation changes because of reversing directions. See Awards 4819 and 10418 of the Third Division.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

13342-12 849

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

    That the Agreement has not been violated.


                AWARD


    Claim denied.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: S. H. Schulty

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of February 1965.