THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-5198) that:
1. Prior to September 16, 1960, the Carrier maintained at Chicago, Illinois, Stores facilities at Glenn Locomotive and Car Repair Shops and Brighton Coachyard Shop located some five miles apart. Materials were purchased locally and requisitioned from the General Storehouses at Bloomington, Illinois and Jackson, Tennessee. Employes covered by the Clerks' Agreement performed the work of ordering, receiving, unloading, storing, inventorying, record keeping, cataloguing and delivering all materials to the using departments. Practically all materials were received and unloaded at Glenn Shops and those needed at Brighton Park were moved by truck from Glenn to Brighton Park where a Section Stockman covered by the Agreement took
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimants involved herein are Group 3 employes holding seniority as laborers and were employed in and around storehouses. Prior to September 16, 1960, Carrier maintained at Chicago, Illinois, Stores' facilities at Glenn Locomotive and Car Repair Shop and at Brighton Park Coachyard Shop. Materials were purchased locally and requisitioned from general storehouses at Bloomington, Illinois. On September 15, 1960, Carrier discontinued the storehouses at Brighton Park and Glenn and abolished all the positions in the Stores Department at Chicago. Upon abolishment of Stores' positions, materials were charged out to the departments to which they would have been issued on receipt of requisitions. Mechanical Department Supervisors in charge of the shops at Glenn and Brighton Park were instructed that all future requisitions for materials for their use should be sent to Bloomington, Illinois, from whence material would be shipped to them direct. Claimants contend the Carrier in violation of Rule 65 of the Agreement began to require the work of unloading, loading and delivering material, all work previously done by these Group 3 employes, be performed by employes outside of their effective Agreement.
Carrier contends that whether or not storehouses are to be maintained is a responsibility of management determined by requirements of the service. Petitioner concedes the Carrier's right to effect a change in its "charge-out" procedure without consulting its employes, or their bargaining agent, but does charge that the conduct of the Carrier in abolishing these positions was not bona fide and was done to circumvent the Agreement. 13375-31 28(j
Nothing contained in the Agreement prohibits the closing of these storehouses. Carrier has an inherent right to manage the affairs of the Company and to direct the performance of its employes subject only to any restriction placed upon that right by the collective Agreement with its employes.
Carrier further contends that the handling of materials, during the times when there is no Stores Department in operation, is the sole responsibility of Mechanical Dept. employes; that the replacing of coal-fired locomotives with diesel electric locomotives with a subsequent dimunition of work led to the conclusion that the need for the branch storehouses at Glenn and Brighton Park no longer existed; that thereafter materials and supplies for use at Glenn and at Brighton Park were issued by the central storehouse at Bloomington or by other suppliers directly to the using department in the same manner as had always been customary in disbursing materials and supplies to points at which branch stores are not maintained; that all storehouse functions at Glenn and Brighton Park having been eliminated by the closing of storehouses at these points, all positions involved in the performance of storehouse functions were abolished.
Lastly, Carrier contends Petitioner has failed to establish by satisfactory proof that the type of work here involved was ever historically, traditionally or customarily performed exclusively by employes holding seniority under the Agreement effective November 1, 1950; that as a matter of fact laborers from the Mechanical Department have performed much of this work in the past.
From a reading of this record we must conclude that Claimants have failed to establish that, after the abolishment of the storehouses at Brighton Park and Glenn, any of their work remained or that any of their work was performed by laborers holding seniority outside of their Agreement; secondly, they have not satisfactorily established that the work they had performed prior to September 15, 1960, was exclusively performed by them nor that historically, traditionally or customarily they had an exclusive right to perform such work. A denial award is required.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and