Award No. 13569
Docket No. SG-12721
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Nathan Engelstein,
Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN
HUDSON & MANHATTAN RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the General Committee of the
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen on the Hudson and Manhattan Railroad
Company:
In behalf of Signal Repairman W. F. Forman, with headquarters
at Hudson Terminal, for eight (8) hours at the time and one-half
rate account Carrier assigning junior Signal Repairmen to perform
overtime service on February 19, 1960.
[Carrier's File: Time Claim No. 156]
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF
FACTS: On February 19, 1960, Signal
Repairmen W. F. Forman, R. Clark and C. Hines were located at Hudson
Terminal, their assigned headquarters, and were near completion of their
12:00 Midnight to 8:00 A. M. shift when flooding conditions developed in the
area of Caissons 1, 2 and 3, which required that the Carrier assign two of
the above three men to work beyond the end of their regular tour on overtime.
Signal Repairman Forman was the senior employe of the three listed
above, but the Carrier did not permit him to work the required overtime.
Instead, the Carrier arbitrarily assigned the two junior Signal Repairmen,
Clark and Hines, to perform the overtime work which consumed 8 hours.
Signal Repairman Forman, being the senior employe of the three available Signal Repairmen, filed a claim for eight (8) hours at the time and
one-half rate account his being denied the right on the basis of his seniority to work the overtime in preference to the junior Signal Repairmen.
The time claim was denied by Mr. A. D. Moore, Superintendent of Signals on April 5, 1960, and subsequently progressed by General Chairman J. J.
Reese, Jr., to Mr. J. C. Warren, General Superintendent, under date of May
10, 1960, as follows:
"On February 19, 1960, Signal Repairmen W. F. Forman, R. Clark
and C. Hines were located at Hudson Terminal, their assigned headquarters, and were near completion of their 12 MN to 8:00 A. M.
tour when, at about 7 A. M., an occasion arose which required that
[2461
13569-7
252
OPINION OF BOARD: For the reasons stated in Docket SG-12382, we
hold that the Agreement was not violated.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
The Agreement of the parties was not violated.
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of April 1965.
LABOR MEMBER'S DISSENT TO AWARD
13569,
DOCKET SG-12721
My Dissent to Award 13566 also applies to this case.
G. Orndorff
Labor Member