Award No. 14363 Docket No. CL-13048
THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-5061) that:
(1) The Carrier violated the terms of the Clerks' Agreement when it failed and refused to allow Clerk Mildred O'Kief 10 days' sick-leave pay for 10 work days in the period January 3 through 16, 1961, namely, January 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 16, 1961, and,
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Claimant Mildred O'Kief is regularly assigned to Car Clerk Job No. 416 in Carrier's Yard Office with rest days of Saturday and Sunday and rate of pay of $19.90 per day. She has been in the service of the Carrier since January 13, 1955.
Claimant has been unable to work since November 29, 1960, because of hypertension and exhaustion. She has been under the care of Dr. Morrison, who is a Company doctor on the staff of the Northern Pacific Terminal Hospital Department. Claimant filed time card claim for 10 days' sick-leave for the period January 3 through January 16, 1961, excluding the four rest days, with Personnel Manager H. H. Any. In a letter to Claimant under date of January 20, 1961, Personnel Manager Any declined payment of the claim.
Claimant referred the claim to the General Chairman, who, on February 1, 1961, appealed the claim by letter to Manager J. H. Jones. A copy of said letter was furnished Personnel Manager Any with notification that his decision was rejected.
9. Conference was held on June 6, 1961, when this claim was discussed, and on July 14, 1961, Carrier again advised Petitioner that the claim was declined.
The parties here apparently agree that April 2, 1961 was the 60th and last day for disallowance of the claim by Carrier's manager in order to comply with the time limit provisions of Rule 42, Section 1. The Manager's letter disallowing the claim bore the date of April 2, but in his letter appealing the claim to the Manager, the General Chairman stated:
The manager did not deny this statement in his reply to the General Chairman and it does not appear from the record that the statement was ever denied during handling on the property. The claim must, therefore, be allowed in accordance with the provision of Rule 42.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and