TRANSPORTATION-OOMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION
(Formerly The Order of Railroad Telegraphers)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Gulf, Mobile and Ohio Railroad, that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Agreement between the parties, effective June 1, 1953, as amended and supplemented, is available to your Board and by this reference is made a part hereof.
Okolona, Mississippi is located on the Southern Division (Old M&M District) of the Carrier's lines. There are two telegrapher positions at Okolona. Both are seven-day positions. The assigned hours of the first-shift are 8:00 A. M. to 4:00 P. M., and the second-shift from 12 Midnight to 8:00 A. M. No telegrapher is assigned to work between 4:00 P. M. and midnight. Claimant J. J. Brewer is the occupant of the Relief Position (relieving on both positions on the rest days thereof), and relieved on the first shift position on December30, 1961 (Saturday).
At 8:25 P. M. on December i30, 1961, a time when no telegrapher was on duty at Okolona, Conductor A. R. Betts in charge of Train No. 31, teIe-
lead to confusion and misunderstanding among people familiar with railroad terms.
The claim also refers to a conversation between a conductor at Okolona -and a telegrapher at Artesia. The Carrier has no knowledge or information regarding the contents of this telephone conversation and the Organization has not seen fit to furnish the Carrier with whatever further information they have regarding this conversation.
The Agreement between the parties is one effective June 1, 1953, copy of which is on file with this Board and by reference made a part hereof.
OPINION OF BOARD: The precise issue here presented has been before the Board on numerous occasions in disputes between the same parties, involving the same agreement and similar contentions. The awards rendered on the prior disputes have been generally unfavorable to the employes.
No purpose would be served by an exhaustive analysis of the prior awards and comparison with .the present case. It is enough to note that there are no distinguishing differences in principle between this case and those covered by Awards 12097, 11343 and 11707. The prior awards are not palpably erroneous and they must be considered to be controlling. Accordingly, the claim will be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and