"N'365 Award No. 14634
Docket No. CL-15147

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-5611) that:




EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Under date of March 31, 1959 the System Committee negotiated a Memorandum Agreement in connection with Docket Claim File CL 6635, File CL 1177, which Memorandum Agreement was intended to, and did, qualify Memorandum No. 24 on Pages 170 and 171 of the Clerks' Agreement for situations where leaves of absence were involved. Copy of this memorandum is self-explanatory and is hereto attached and identified as Employes' Exhibit A-1.

March 19, 1963, then Terminal Traimnaster N. S. Smith, Savannah, Georgia Yard Office, issued a bulletin quoting from the Memorandum Agree-

Clerk T. E. Rhodes has never complied with the March 31, 1959 Agreement and thus was not entitled to be utilized to fill any temporary vacancy due to the absence of regularly assigned yard clerk. That is the reason Mr. Rhodes was not allowed to work.


It is a fact that the following letters were written by other Yard Clerks at Savannah, and they are:






These letters are attached as Carrier's Exhibits 1-C, 1-D, 1-E and 1-F, respectively.




The fact is that Clerk B. E. Hooker was paid on Jane 30, July 2, 5 and 6, 1963, in strict keeping with the March 31, 1959 Agreement which states, in part:






There is an agreement in effect between the parties, effective December 1, 1956, as amended. The latest agreement concerning the matter of filling temporary vacancies caused by illness, etc., of regularly assigned clerks, for 1, 2, 3, or more days up to 30 days, is dated March 31, 1959. The March 31, 1959 agreement supersedes and takes precedence over the December 1, 1956 printed agreement insofar as this particular matter is concerned. The Clerks' Agreement as amended by the March 31, 1959 Agreement was literally complied with by the Carrier. The claim filed and handled on the property up to and including the Director of Personnel was denied by all Carrier officers. That claim is not substantiated by any rule, interpretation, or practice on this property. The claim which the Brotherhood is here attempting to assert, was never filed or handled on the property.




OPINION OF BOARD: The factual situation and issues for determination in this instance were presented to this Board in Award 14633. Said Award 14633 being controlling, these claims will be denied.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


14634 10
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and









Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of June, 1966.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
14634 11