THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION

(Formerly The Order of Railroad Telegraphers)


NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY

(Western District)


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the New York Central System (Western District), that:





EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: On August 28, 1961, the Carrier put out the following notice, which stated in part:

"Effective 7:00 AM Tuesday, August 29, 1961
The following track and signal changes in effect at Double Track



The principal duty of .the operators at C&P Crossing was to operate Target "A" for movements of the PRR over the crossing and movements to and from the Pier tracks north of the NYC main line. The normal position of the target was lined for NYC main line.


On September 6, 1961 the crossing diamonds and the targets were removed and in lieu of the diamonds a series of crossovers were installed starting just east of "RN". The PRR track now leads into the NYC main line and the NYC main line between the Double Track and the Drawbridge is a jointly used track. C&P crossing was eliminated as a signal station. The Manual Block system was discontinued through Station "RN", but otherwise "RN" remains unchanged with switchtenders on duty around the clock.


Operation between the Double Track, "RN" and "DE" is shown in the current timetable as follows:





When the diamonds were removed '.he positions were abolished resulting in the claims now subject of this submission.


OPINION OF BOARD: Carrier abolished 1st, 2nd, and 3rd tricks plus relief positions 22 and 26 at C&P Crossing. The Organization asks componsahion for Porter (lst trick) working on a temporary basis; Boehning, Zigman and Karaba for improper displacement; Boyd for one day each week and compensation for four senior idle employes, extra in preference in amount of a day's pay beginning September 6, 1961 and continuing until the alleged violation is corrected. Claimant contends Carrier required other than Telegraphers to perform work that had formerly been performed by the OperatorLeverman.


The record contains abundant allegations describing duties and work remaining to be performed by Claimants subsequent to abolishment of the aforesaid positions. However, in the absence of evidence tending to prove these allegations, they (the allegations) are merely conclusions.


14870

The burden of proving that substantial work remains to be performed subsequent to abolishment of a position is on the Claimant. In this matter, Claimants failed to carry out their burden of proof. The record is void of any ,proof that there had been a transfer of exclusive Telegrapher's duties to another Craft subsequent to abolishment of said positions.



FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and








Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of October 1966.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
14870 6