THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-5462) that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: On January 31, 1963, File 1044, Mr. J. R. Holden, General Superintendent, Pine Bluff, Arkansas, addressed a letter to Mr. T. Campbell, Agent, Memphis, Tennessee, reading:
Relief Clerk Position No. 2, which was abolished in accordance with the above notice, was last bulletined on General Superintendent J. R. Holden's Advertisement No . N-55, issued at Pine Bluff, Arkansas, on October 20, 1960, relieving Train Clerk, 7:00 A. M. to 3:00 P. M., on Friday, Messenger 5:30 A. M., to 2:00 P. M., on Saturday and Sunday, Messenger 4 :00 P. M., to 12:30 A. M., Monday and Tuesday, with Wednesday and Thursday rest days.
basis that the messenger work on such days was unassigned, and belonged to the regular employe (Claimant Bateman) under the provisions of Rule 32.
The claim was denied, appealed, denied on appeal, and handled in conference (Exhibits 4 to 11).
The applicable schedule agreement is that with the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes, reprinted January 1, 1963, including revisions.
OPINION OF BOARD: The facts, out of which the claim arose, are not in dispute. The question, handled on the property, was whether or not the oral assignment of work was valid.
The Employes' position is that work which was orally assigned, nevertheless, remained unassigned work. It contends, therefore, that the regularly assigned employe should have been called to perform the work on his rest days.
There is no showing that an oral assignment of work as opposed to a bulletined assignment is any less effective.
It must be the finding that no violation of Rule 32-8 of the Agreement has been shown and the Claim must, therefore, be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and