NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Don Hamilton, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION OF ST. LOUIS
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood (GL-5729) that:
(1) The Carrier violated the provisions of the Clerks' Agreement when it refused to properly compensate Mr. A. M. Bennett,
Messenger, in the office of Auditor of Freight Revenue, for service
performed on Saturday, May 30, 1964, a regplarly assigned rest day
which was also a holiday.
(2) Carrier shall now be required to compensate Mr. A. M.
Bonnett for eight hours at the rate of time and one-half, in addition to that paid for service performed on May 30, 1964.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Mr. A. M. Bennett is the regular occupant of the five-day position of Messenger in the Auditor of Freight
Revenue's office with a work week of Monday through Friday and rest days
of Saturday and Sunday.
When it developed that there would be Messenger work to be performed
on Saturday, May 30, Mr. Bonnett, being the senior Messenger off duty on that
day, was notified to work.
On June 8, 1964, Mr. Bonnett filed claim for an additional day's pay at
time and one-half (Employes' Exhibit A).
This claim was denied by Mr. E. E. Meyer, Auditor of Freight Revenue,
in his letter of July 23, 1964 (Employes' Exhibit B).
Claim was appealed to Mr. K. L. Kelley, Comptroller, in Local Chairman
Phelps' letter of July 31, 1964 (Employes' Exhibit C).
Comptroller Kelley denied the appeal in his letter of September 17, 1964
(Employes' Exhibit D).
Claim was appealed to Mr. J. W. Hammers, Jr., Manager of Labor Relations, by the General Chairman in his letter of November 16, 1964 (Employes'
Exhibit E).
THE WITNESS: In the absence of such an arrangement
then it is the single time and one-half pay.
Q. (By Mr. Davis.) That answers my question.
The above excerpt from the transcript of the proceeding clearly
reveals that it was not the intent of the Organization to collect two
days' pay at the punitive rate for an employe performing service on
a holiday and rest day combined.
Further evidence of the Organization's previous interpretations
of the rules in question is reflected in the disposition of the following
claims which were processed on the property:
(1) Claim in behalf of Yard Clerk Drennan of the
CD District for an additional eight hours' pay at pro rata
rate for services performed on Memorial Day, May 30, 1959,
which day was one of Drennan's days of rest.
(2) Claim in behalf of Yard Clerk George Joerss for a
day's pay for Thanksgiving Day, November 28, 1957, because
he was not called to fill a vacancy on that date, which was an
assigned rest day.
(3) Claim on behalf of Yard Clerk Fayollat for a day's pay
at the punitive rate for December 25, 1953, because of failure
to call him on his rest day.
It was clear from our discussions that your position rested solely
on the Board Awards referred to, without reference to the position
of the Organization at the time of adoption of the rules referred to
or recognized practices during the period the rules were in effect
prior to rendition of the Third Division Awards upon which you rely.
The claims are whollly without merit, lacking the support of
Agreement rules, and are accordingly denied."
Wages and working conditions of the claimant in this dispute are covered
by Schedule Agreement between the parties effective January 1, 1950, copy of
which is on file with this Division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board.
(Exhibits not reproduced.)
OPINION OF
BOARD: Claimant Bennett is the regular occupant of the
five-day position of Messenger in the Auditor of Freight Revenue's office with
a work week of Monday through Friday and rest days of Saturday and Sunday.
There was messenger work to be performed on Saturday, May 30, 1964,
Decoration Day, and Claimant, being the senior Messenger off duty on that
day, was notified to work.
Carrier compensated Claimant under Rule 39 (e) and Rule 40, for work on
an unassigned day.
"Rule 39 (e). Service on Rest Days. Service rendered by employes
on their assigned rest days
shall be paid for under Rule 40."
15052 7
"RULE 40.
NOTIFIED OR CALLED
Employes notified or called to perform work not continuous with,
before or after, the regular work period, shall be allowed a minimum
of three (3) hours for two (2) hours' work or less, and if held on
duty in excess of two (2) hours, time and one-half will be allowed on
the minute basis.
Employes notified or called to perform work on their assigned
rest days or on holidays shall be paid a minimum of eight (8) hours
at time and one-half rate."
Claimant demands an additional payment under Rule 44 (b) for working
on Decoration Day.
"Rule 44 (b). Holiday Work. Work performed on the following
legal holidays, namely, New Year's Day, Washington's Birthday,
Decoration Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and
Christmas (provided when any of the above holidays fall on Sunday,
the day observed by the state, nation or by proclamation shall be considered the holiday), shall be paid for at the rate of time and
one-half."
This problem has been before the Board on several other occasions. The
Organization contends that awards which control include: 10541, 10679, 11454,
11899, 12453, 12471, 14138, 14489 and 14528. The Carrier contends that we should
follow Award 14240 and Award No. 23 of Special Board of Adjustment No. 564.
We have studied the awards cited and are persuaded that the principle of
stare decisis compels us to follow what appears to be the weight of authority
it,
the decided cases. We therefore will sustain the claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein, and
That the Agreement was violated.
AWARD
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of December 1966.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
15052 8