PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-5729) that:






EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Mr. A. M. Bennett is the regular occupant of the five-day position of Messenger in the Auditor of Freight Revenue's office with a work week of Monday through Friday and rest days of Saturday and Sunday.


When it developed that there would be Messenger work to be performed on Saturday, May 30, Mr. Bonnett, being the senior Messenger off duty on that day, was notified to work.


On June 8, 1964, Mr. Bonnett filed claim for an additional day's pay at time and one-half (Employes' Exhibit A).


This claim was denied by Mr. E. E. Meyer, Auditor of Freight Revenue, in his letter of July 23, 1964 (Employes' Exhibit B).


Claim was appealed to Mr. K. L. Kelley, Comptroller, in Local Chairman Phelps' letter of July 31, 1964 (Employes' Exhibit C).


Comptroller Kelley denied the appeal in his letter of September 17, 1964 (Employes' Exhibit D).


Claim was appealed to Mr. J. W. Hammers, Jr., Manager of Labor Relations, by the General Chairman in his letter of November 16, 1964 (Employes' Exhibit E).















Wages and working conditions of the claimant in this dispute are covered by Schedule Agreement between the parties effective January 1, 1950, copy of which is on file with this Division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board.




OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant Bennett is the regular occupant of the five-day position of Messenger in the Auditor of Freight Revenue's office with a work week of Monday through Friday and rest days of Saturday and Sunday.


There was messenger work to be performed on Saturday, May 30, 1964, Decoration Day, and Claimant, being the senior Messenger off duty on that day, was notified to work.


Carrier compensated Claimant under Rule 39 (e) and Rule 40, for work on an unassigned day.



15052 7

"RULE 40.

NOTIFIED OR CALLED




Claimant demands an additional payment under Rule 44 (b) for working on Decoration Day.



This problem has been before the Board on several other occasions. The Organization contends that awards which control include: 10541, 10679, 11454, 11899, 12453, 12471, 14138, 14489 and 14528. The Carrier contends that we should follow Award 14240 and Award No. 23 of Special Board of Adjustment No. 564.


We have studied the awards cited and are persuaded that the principle of stare decisis compels us to follow what appears to be the weight of authority it, the decided cases. We therefore will sustain the claim.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein, and




AWARD Claim sustained.






Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 14th day of December 1966.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
15052 8