CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE, ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC
RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-5828) that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: On September 17, 1964, Bulletins No. MM-182, MM-183 and MM-184 were issued by Carrier, each advertising a position of Wheel Roller in Seniority District No. 118, i.e., Position 5188, rate of pay $21.2068 per day, Position 5189, rate of pay $21.2068 per day and Position 5190, rate of pay of $19.8144. Submitted as Employes Exhibits A, B and C, respectively are copies of these bulletins.
It will be noted that the duties assigned to each of those positions by bulletin are identical.
There was no similar position in the seniority district when Wheel Roller Positions 5188, 5189 and 5190 were established; consequently, under the rules, the rate of pay to be applied to those positions was subject to negotiation and agreement.
The Carrier, however, not only unilaterally established the rate of pay, but established a lessor rate of pay on Position No. 5190 than the rate of pay established on Positions 5188 and 5189, although all three positions were of the same classification with the same duties assigned by bulletin.
On September 23, 1964 the General Chairman addressed the following letter to Mr. E. F. Volkman, Manager of Materials, Milwaukee, Wis.:
assigned rest days, the same rate of pay, etc. are attached hereto as Carrier's Exhibits A, B and C respectively.
Attached hereto as Carrier's Exhibit D is copy of letter written by Mr. S. W. Amour, Assistant to Vice President, to Mr. H. V. Gilligan, General Chairman, under date of March 17, 1965.
On September 17, 1964, Carrier established three new wheel roller positions at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in Seniority District No. 118. There were no positions of similar kind or class in the Seniority Distrizt. Carrier unilaterally set the rate of pay for the new positions. It failed and refused to establish the rate of pay by agreement in the manner prescribed in Rule 18; a fortiori Carrier violated the Agreement. We will sustain paragraph 1 of the Claim.
In paragraph 2 of the Claim the Organization prays that Claimants be paid the difference between the rate of pay unilaterally set by Carrier and a rate of $21.6068 arbitrarily set by the Organization. We cannot accept the Organization's arbitrary rate. The rate can be established only through negotiations between the parties. We, therefore, will dismiss paragraph 2 of the Claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and