PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
GULF, MOBILE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement and understanding relating thereto when it failed and refused to fill the position of Road Carpenter while Road Carpenter R. V. Coleman was on vacation from June 2 to 21, 1963, inclusive. (Carrier's file E-41-103.)





EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The General Chairman addressed a letter to the Carrier's Chief Engineer, which reads:







Dear Sir:

One of the B&B Men has told me that when the Road Carpenter and his Helper on Seniority District No. 3 take their vacations, their positions will not be filled.



CLASSIFICATION OF BRIDGE AND

BUILDING GANG RATES







OPINION OF BOARD: The central issue of this claim is whether Carrier had an obligation to fill the position of Road Carpenter during the 1963 vacation of Road Carpenter R. V. Coleman.


Organization contends that in a Letter of Understanding of December 20, 1961, Carrier and Brotherhood agreed to fill the position of Road Carpenter when that employe is on vacation.


Carrier denies the claim with the assertion that the Letter of Understanding applied to a special set of circumstances arising out of another claim and does not apply to the instant situation.


Our study of the record with regard to this Letter of Understanding reveals that on December 11, 1961, the Chief Engineer of Carrier and the General Chairman held a conference in which they discussed the case of a Road Carpenter Helper who claimed additional compensation for the days the Road Carpenter was on vacation because the Road Carpenter's position was not filled and the Road Carpenter's Helper was required to assume the responsibilities and duties of the two positions. The settlement was confirmed in a Letter of Understanding of December 20, 1961, in which the Chief Engineer wrote to the General Chairman:



15379 8

This Letter of Understanding concerns a situation in which the Road Carpenter's Helper remained on the position while the Road Carpenter was on vacation. The settlement provided that in this case where the Road Carpenter and Helper, members of a two man gang, were assigned vacations at different times and where the Helper was required to perform the services of a Road Carpenter, he was entitled to the higher rate of pay.


In the instant case, unlike the situation to which the Letter of Understanding refers, both members of the two man gang, Road Carpenter R. V. Coleman and the Road Carpenter's Helper R. L. Campbell, were assigned the same vacation period. They therefore performed no services during the vacation period nor did other employes assume their duties. There is no requirement in the current Agreement or in the Vacation Agreement that Carrier must fill a position during a vacation period.


Since the Letter of Understanding is not relevant to the factual situation under consideration, we hold the Agreement was not violated.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:



That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and








Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of February 1967.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
15379 9