PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION

(Formerly The Order of Railroad Telegraphers)




STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Illinois Central Railroad, that the Carrier violated the agreement between the parties:

1. (a) When, on June 2, 1960, at Waggoner, Illinois (in the absence of an emergency), it permitted or required trainman Evoy of Train No. 68 to call the dispatcher at Champaign, Illinois on the telephone in connection with train movements.


(b) Because of such violation at Waggoner Carrier shall be required to compensate the senior idle extra operator, as of that date, a day's pay of eight hours at straight time rate.


2. (a) When, on July 1, 1960, at Avenue Yard, Springfield, Illinois (in the absence of an emergency), it permitted or required trainman Reeves of Train Extra 9023 South to call the dispatcher at Champaign, Illinois on the telephone in connection with train movements.


(b) Because of such violation at Avenue Yard Carrier shall be required to compensate the senior idle extra operator, as of that date, a day's pay of eight hours at straight time rate.


3. (a) When, on July 1, 1960, at Toronto, Illinois (in the absence of an emergency), it permitted or required trainman Reeves of Train Extra '3023 South to call the dispatcher at Champaign, Blinois on the telephone in connection with train movements.


(b) Because of such violation at Toronto, Carrier shall be required to compensate the senior idle extra operator next in line, as of that date, a day's pay of eight hours at straight time rate.


4. (a) When, on July 1, 1960, at Waggoner, Illinois (in the absence of an emergency), it permitted or required trainman Reeves of Train Extra 9023 South to call the dispatcher at Champaign, Illinois on the telephone in connection with train movements.






EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The current agreement between the parties (which by reference hereto is made a part of this submission) provides in Rule 1-Scope as follows:












16470 2

correspondence exchanged between the Manager of Personnel and the General Chairman relative to these disputes.


The Agreement between the parties, effective June 1, 1951, as revised December 1, 1956, is by reference made a part hereof.



OPINION OF BOARD: This case involves an interpretation of Rule 4 (c) of the Agreement as interpreted by Award 13689.


It appears to the Board that the instances complained of in this case are of the same nature as the claim involved in Award 13689. We, therefore, hold on the basis of stare decisis, that the conclusions reached in that case are controlling in the instant dispute, and the claims will be sustained.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and



AWARD Claim sustained.




Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of April 1967.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
15470 14