NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Don Hamilton, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION
(Formerly The Order of Railroad Telegraphers)
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the General Committee of The
Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Illinois Central Railroad, that the
Carrier violated the agreement between the parties:
1. (a) When, on June 2, 1960, at Waggoner, Illinois (in the
absence of an emergency), it permitted or required trainman Evoy of
Train No. 68 to call the dispatcher at Champaign, Illinois on the
telephone in connection with train movements.
(b) Because of such violation at Waggoner Carrier shall be
required to compensate the senior idle extra operator, as of that
date, a day's pay of eight hours at straight time rate.
2. (a) When, on July 1, 1960, at Avenue Yard, Springfield, Illinois (in the absence of an emergency), it permitted or required
trainman Reeves of Train Extra 9023 South to call the dispatcher
at Champaign, Illinois on the telephone in connection with train
movements.
(b) Because of such violation at Avenue Yard Carrier shall
be required to compensate the senior idle extra operator, as of that
date, a day's pay of eight hours at straight time rate.
3. (a) When, on July 1, 1960, at Toronto, Illinois (in the absence of an emergency), it permitted or required trainman Reeves
of Train Extra '3023 South to call the dispatcher at Champaign, Blinois on the telephone in connection with train movements.
(b) Because of such violation at Toronto, Carrier shall be
required to compensate the senior idle extra operator next in line,
as of that date, a day's pay of eight hours at straight time rate.
4. (a) When, on July 1, 1960, at Waggoner, Illinois (in the
absence of an emergency), it permitted or required trainman Reeves
of Train Extra 9023 South to call the dispatcher at Champaign, Illinois on the telephone in connection with train movements.
(b) Because of such violation at Waggoner Carrier shall be
required to compensate the senior idle extra operator next in line,
as of that date, a day's pay of eight hours at straight time rate.
5. (a) When, on July 2, 1960, at Mt. Pulaski, Illinois (in the
absence of an emergency), it permitted or required trainman Reeves
of Train No. 68 to call the dispatcher at Champaign, Illinois on the
telephone in connection with train movements.
(b) Because of such violations at Mt. Pulaski Carrier shall
be required to compensate the senior idle operator, as of that date,
a day's pay of eight hours at straight time rate.
6. (a) When, on July 2, 1960, at Avenue Yard, Springfield,
Illinois (in the absence of an emergency), it permitted or required
trainman Westray of Train Extra 9156 South to call the dispatcher
at Champaign, Illinois on the telephone in connection with train
movements.
(b) Because of such violation at Avenue Yard Carrier shall
be required to compensate the senior idle extra telegrapher next
in line as of that date, a day's pay of eight hours at straight time
rate.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The current agreement between the parties (which by reference hereto is made a part of this submission) provides in Rule 1-Scope as follows:
"A. For positions held by manager, chief and assistant chief
operators, telegraphers, telephone operators, mechanical message
machine operators located in telegraph offices, mechanical message
machine operators who transmit telegrams between points not
within one terminal, agents (freight and ticket), agent telegraphers,
agent telephoners, towermen, levermen, tower and train directors,
block operators and staffmen, except as per Rule 2, the following
rates of pay, rules for overtime and working conditions will apply
k
* r
1,
The balance of Rule 1 is not pertinent to this dispute.
Rule 2-Exceptions, specifies that:
"The provisions of this schedule will not apply to train dispatchers, yardmasters, mechanical message machine operators, except as
specified in Rule 1, telautograph operators, switchboard operators,
supervisory or traffic department agents; nor small non-telegraph
stations except as specified in Rule 33."
"RULE 4.
HANDLING TRAIN ORDERS
A. No employe other than covered by this schedule and train
dispatchers will be permitted to handle train orders at telegraph
or
16470 2
correspondence exchanged between the Manager of Personnel and the General Chairman relative to these disputes.
The Agreement between the parties, effective June 1, 1951, as revised
December 1, 1956, is by reference made a part hereof.
(Exhibits not reproduced.)
OPINION OF BOARD:
This case involves an interpretation of Rule
4 (c) of the Agreement as interpreted by Award 13689.
It appears to the Board that the instances complained of in this case
are of the same nature as the claim involved in Award 13689. We, therefore,
hold on the basis of stare decisis, that the conclusions reached in that case
are controlling in the instant dispute, and the claims will be sustained.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
AWARD
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD
ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 7th day of April 1967.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
15470 14