THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES

THE UNION TERMINAL COMPANY

(Dallas, Texas)


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-5555), that:




EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: John H. Rhodes was employed by The Union Terminal Company as a porter on September 22, 1947, and he continued to hold an assignment in the Mail Department until May 13, 1963, when he was arrested and removed from the job by police officers of the Dallas, Texas Police Department, and carried to the city jail account of complaint received from Union Terminal Company Special Agent Mr. R. W. Tillery.

Mr. E. F. Ahrens, Mail, Baggage and Ticket Agent of The Union Terminal Company wrote Mr. Rhodes a letter dated Dallas, Texas, May 16, 1963, reading as follows:

6. Claimant Rhodes testified. He confirmed that he had a conversation with Green, but claims the worst he said was "I wish you'd go tell them fellows to quit that damn hollering." (Tr. p. 38.) He said he told Officer Fox:




He said he gave Fox his knife. He said Green used no profanity, and said (Tr. 42) he told Green he "wished he'd tell them damn fellows down there to keep their mouths shut" He denied everything else relevant to the charge. He said he did not even take his knife out of his pocket. He even denied seeing or talking with Smotherman.


On the basis of the evidence, claimant was found guilty, and was dismissed from the service. He was later offered reinstatement, after some six months out of service. In fact, he was reinstated to his employe status, but has never performed further service for the Carrier due to the fact that he was found, by uncontested medical examination and evidence, to be suffering two disqualifying defects, the most alarming (and probably the most pertinent here) of which is hypertension-blood pressure 240/130.


Claimant knows, as does Petitioner, that he is eligible to perform service when it is safe for him to do so. Part (c) of their claim, in fact, reads:




OPINION OF BOARD: Petitioner moves that the Claim be allowed as presented on the grounds that Carrier's highest officer failed to disallow it within 60 days, as prescribed in Article V, 1 (a) and (c) of the National Agreement of August 21, 1954. It computes the number of days from the date which the General Chairman's letter of appeal bears. The computation of the sixty days, it has been held, runs from the date of receipt. National Disputes Committee Decision 16; also, Award Nos. 13780, 14695 and 15443. The record does not reveal the date of receipt. We, therefore, are unable to determine whether the disallowance was or was not timely. Motion denied.


Carrier moves that the Claim be dismissed on the grounds that the Claim was not submitted "to the officer of Carrier authorized to receive same", as required by Article V, 1 (a) of the August 21, 1954 Agreement. Carrier adduced no evidence to support its averment as to designation of the authorized officer. Petitioner avers that the Claim was handled on the property in the usual manner in compliance with Title I, Section 3, First (i) of the Railway Labor Act. Carrier had the burden of proof. It failed to meet it. Motion denied.


Carrier addressed the following letter to Claimant under date of May 16, 1963:




15544 9


At the request of Claimant the hearing was postponed to May 28, 1963. Following the hearing Carrier, under date of June 5, 1963, informed Claimant:





The burden of proving that Claimant was guilty as charged rested with Carrier. To meet the burden, the transcript of the hearing must contain substantial material and relevant evidence of probative value supporting Carrier's findings.






Q. You state that he did use profane languageA. Yes, sir.







15544 10












Other witnesses called by Carrier testified that Claimant had an open knife in his hand when he approached Green, but none of them testified that Claimant threatened Green. These witnesses did testify that the use of profanity was common on the job; indeed, one of Carrier's own witnesses used the words "God damn" in his testimony.


Claimant denied that he had an open knife in his hand, or that he used profanity; but, even assuming that he did, we find no evidence in the recordeven in Green's testimony-that Claimant acted in a threatening manner. Therefore, we find that Carrier failed to prove the precise charge. In arriving at this conclusion we have made no assessment of credibility. We have merely weighed Carrier's direct case in its best light and have found it wanting.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:



That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and





    Claims (a) and (c) are sustained. Claim (b) denied.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: S. H. Schulty

              Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 5th day of May 1967.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
15544 11