^'"e Award No. 15606
Docket No. MW-16314


THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it disqualified and demoted Section Foreman William L. McCue effective at the close of work on January 13, 1965.



EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Prior to the close of work on Wednesday, January 13, 1965, the claimant was the regularly assigned foreman of the crew assigned to Section No. 232, with headquarters at West Seboois, Maine. The claimant had established seniority as a track foreman as of May 6, 1926. The claimant received a letter reading:




Mr. William L. McCue
Foreman Section No. 232
West Schools

Dear Sir:

Confirming conversation between you, Chief Engineer Swales and Superintendent of Track G. L. Swett, at West Seboois, on January 7th.


This Company requires that a Section Foreman be able to fulfill all duties of that position and on crews where trucks are assigned it is necessary for the Section Foreman to be able to operate the truck in the performance of his duties. This last necessarily means that a Section Foreman must have a State of Maine Operator's License in order to legally operate the truck or vehicle when called upon. Since













                        /s( H. C. Duffy

                        Manager of Operations


    cc: P. H. Swales

    J. H. Daly"


On May 6, 1966, Manager of Operations H. C. Duffy received a copy of a letter which had been addressed to S. H. Schulty, Executive Secretary-Third Division, NRAB by President H. C. Crotty of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes announcing his intention to file an ex parte submission in this dispute.


OPINION OF BOARD: Carrier moves that the Claim be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in that no conference was had as required by the Railway Labor Act and the Rules of Procedure of the National Railroad Adjustment Board.


The record shows that from the date of the filing of the Claim, no conference was requested or held relative to it. We have previously held that a conference is essential to confer jurisdiction upon. this Board. Awards 10852, 10939, 11136, 11484, 12499, 13721. Motion granted.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


15606 13
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board does not have jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein.
                  AWARD

'Claim dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: S. H. Schulty

              Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 31st day of May 1967.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
15606 14