THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION
(Formerly The Order of Railroad Telegraphers)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Grand Trunk Western Railroad, that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: There is in evidence an Agreement by and between the Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, hereinafter referred to as Carrier, and its employes represented by The Order of Railroad Telegraphers, hereinafter referred to as Employes or Organization, effective November 1, 1955, and as amended. Copies of said Agreement are, as required by law, assumed to be on file with this Board, and are, by this reference, made a part hereof.
At page 56 of said Agreement (Addendum No. 1) is listed the position existing at Gaines, Michigan, the locale of the dispute involved in this claim, as of the effective date of said Agreement. The listing, for ready reference, reads:
At a time and date not shown in the record, centralized traffic control was installed between Durand and West Pontiac, Michigan. Gaines is located within this centralized traffic control territory, approximately four (4) rail miles from Durand.
Copies of the Telegrapbers' Working Agreement which became effective on this property on November 1, 1955, are on file with the Third Division.
OPINION OF BOARD: The Organization contends that a message related to the yard crew which was written down and repeated back to the dispatcher was a train order within the contemplation of Rule 15. On the property, Carrier established that for many years such messages, though not written down, had not been treated as train orders, but, instead, as "track and time messages."
This Board has previously drawn a distinction between train orders and "track and time messages." See Award 14028 (Hamilton).
The issue here is the narrow one of whether or not reducing the "track and time message" to writing and "reading it back" made it a train order.
We think it does not. The common sense rule is, and should be, that the substance, and not the form, controls. Therefore, where the treatment of such messages on the property was that same were not train orders, the mere reducing same to writing and "reading them back" would not then make them train orders and, accordingly, the claim in this case is denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and