THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY

(Pacific Lines)


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:




EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The claimants were regularly assigned to their respective positions in B&B Gang No. 106, with headquarters at Roseville, California. They were regularly assigned to work on Monday through Friday of each week. Saturdays and Sundays were designated rest days.


During the work week commencing on Monday, January 4, 1965, the Carrier assigned the claimants to patrol and repair the drain tunnel located under westbound track at Mile Post 122.78, Auburn, California. However, when it became necessary to perform work of the same character during overtime hours on Saturday, January 9 and Sunday, January 10, 1965, the Carrier called and used the foreman and seven (7) laborers who are regularly assigned members of Extra Gang No. 13 to perform said work. The members of Extra Gang No. 13 performed a total of 128 man hours of work at this work project on the subject dates. They were compensated for their services at their respective time and one-half rates. On Monday, January 11, 1965, the claimants were again assigned to this work project.

By letter dated May 5, 1965, Petitioner's General Chairman appealed claim to Carrier's Assistant Manager of Personnel requesting payment on behalf of Claimants at their respective time and one-half rates of pay for each for proportionate share of 128 hours consumed by employes of the Track Subdepartment, alleging violations by Carrier of the current agreement, particularly Rules 1, 2, 5 and 25 (Carrier's Exhibit C).


By letter dated August 3, 1965, Carrier's Assistant Manager of Personnel denied the claim on the basis that cleaning of debris out of culverts, and draining of excess water caused by such clogging is not work reserved to employes of any particular sub-department but is on occasion performed by various classes of employes in conjunction with their other duties (Carrier's Exhibit D).



OPINION OF BOARD: Carrier here involved concedes, in its letter denying the claim, that:




This same issue came before Special Board of Adjustment No. 287 (Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company) in its Docket No. 6 with the Referee here sitting.


That Board sustained the claim, citing Second Division Award 1825, which held:




FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and










Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 21st day of November 1967.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
15951 3