-4w *as
Award No. 16107
Docket No. MW-16207
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
Herbert J. Mesigh, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
ELGIN, JOLIET AND EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it failed and
refused to assign the position of motor car repairman as advertised
by Gary Division Bulletin No. 3408 to Crossing Watchman J. D.
Greer, who was the only applicant for said position. (System Case
No. SG-12064-WM-13-64.)
(2) Crossing Watchman J. D. Greer be allowed the difference
between what he was paid at the crossing watchman's rate and what
he would have received at the motor repairman's rate had he
properly been awarded the position referred to in Part (1) of this
claim.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The claimant entered the
Carrier's service as a track laborer within the Track Sub-Department in
February, 1957. In addition to his seniority as a track laborer, the claimant
has established and holds seniority as a highway crossing watchman in
said sub-department as of Februry, 1959, thereafter being regularly assigned as such.
The Carrier issued Gary Division Bulletin No. 3408 advertising a position of motor car repairman, which read:
"No. 3408
Joliet, Illinois
August 11, 1964
(Scales & Work Equip. Subdept., Gary Divn.
(Group 2, Track Subdept., Gary Divn.
To: All Employes (B&B Subdept., Gary Divn.
(All Others, Track Subdept., Gary Diva.
pany), in the Scales and Work Equipment sub-department will be
filled first by employes holding seniority in the group and rank
in which the vacancy or new position occurs. If not so filled, they
will be filled by qualified employes in succeeding lower ranks in
that sub-department. In the event the vacancies or new positions
are not so filled by employes in the Scales and Work Equipment
sub-department, they will be filled by qualified employes from Group
2 Track sub-department desiring same or qualified employes desiring same from the Bridge and Building Sub-Department and the
Track Sub-Department in that order before hiring a new employe.
Employes so assigned will retain their seniority rights in the respective other groups and sub-departments from which taken.
"MAKING PROMOTIONS
Rule 8. Promotion shall be based on ability, merit, and seniority. Ability and merit being sufficient, seniority shall prevail,
management to be the judge of ability and merit, subject to appeal."
"FAILURE TO QUALIFY
Rule 10. Employes awarded bulletined positions will be allowed sixty (60) calendar days in which to qualify for such position and failing to do so will be so notified within seven (7) calendar days of the expiration of the sixty (60) day qualifying period at which time they will have the right to return to their former positions without loss of seniority.
(Emphasis ours.)
(Exhibits not reproduced.)
OPINION OF BOARD:
On August 11, 1964, Carrier posted Bulletin
No. 3408, advertising position of Motor Car Repairman. Claimant, a crossing watchman, was the only bidder. Claimant was denied the position as "not
qualified." Carrier re-bulletined the position and made assignment of the
position to an employe junior to claimant.
Carrier's Supervisor Scales and Work Equipment declined the Organization's claim on behalf of claimant, asserting that in the instant case Mr.
Greer had obtained a score of Zero when given the "Wonderlic Mental Ability Test"; therefore, based upon his failure to record any score, it was
determined that he did not have sufficient ability to be considered for
promotion to the position of Motor Car Repairman.
This dispute is identical in principle with cases covered by our Awards
15002 (Zumas), 15586 (House) and 15972 (Mesigh), involving the same par-
16107 10
ties, ruls, and, in substance, the same issue. Our findings in those awards
ties, rules, and, in substance, the same issue. Our findings in those awards
are dispositive of the issues in the instant dispute, and following the principle of Stare Decisis, we sustain the claim here.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Carrier violated the Agreement.
AWARD
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this let day of March 1968.
Keenan
Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
16107 il