Afflwsas Award No. 16314
Docket No. MS-17080-







PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



THE CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY

(Chesapeake District)

and

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,

FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES




A. Protest that I, Lloyd Y. Bayless, was denied the right to exercise my seniority to a Clerical Position on the seniority roster of Group One clerks, Transportation Department, Huntington Division, Huntington District, on June 1, 1965; and




D. Request that I be compensated for any and all wages lost, that may have derived from this misunderstanding regarding my seniority.


OPINION OF BOARD: The Claimant attempts before the Board tom assert a claim that the Carrier and the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks violated the effective Agreement covering Carrier's clerical and station employes.

This Board is without jurisdiction to decide a dispute between an employe and his organization (Section 3, First (i) of Railway Labor Act). We must, therefore, dismiss the claim against the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks.

So far as the claim against the Carrier is concerned, the record is clear that the dispute was not handled on the property in the manner prescribed by Section 3, First (i) of the Railway Labor Act, the time limit rule of the applicable Agreement, or Circular No. 1 of the National Railroad Adjustment Board. Therefore, the claim against the Carrier is barred and must be dismissed.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon :he whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934; and









Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of May 1968.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
16314 2