Afflwsas
Award No. 16314
Docket No. MS-17080-
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Nathan Engelstein, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
LLOYD Y. BAYLESS
THE CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY
(Chesapeake District)
and
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS,
FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
A. Protest that I, Lloyd Y. Bayless, was denied the right to
exercise my seniority to a Clerical Position on the seniority roster
of Group One clerks, Transportation Department, Huntington Division, Huntington District, on June 1, 1965; and
B. Protest that my name, Lloyd Y. Bayless, was improperly removed from the seniority roster of Group One clerks, Transportation
Department, Huntington Division, Huntington District, when that
roster was reissued on July 1, 1965; and
C. Request that my name be promptly restored to that roster
in its proper place in accord with my seniority standing on the previous rosters; and
D. Request that I be compensated for any and all wages lost,
that may have derived from this misunderstanding regarding my
seniority.
OPINION OF BOARD:
The Claimant attempts before the Board tom
assert a claim that the Carrier and the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks violated the effective Agreement covering Carrier's clerical and
station employes.
This Board is without jurisdiction to decide a dispute between an employe and his organization (Section 3, First (i) of Railway Labor Act). We
must, therefore, dismiss the claim against the Brotherhood of Railway and
Steamship Clerks.
So far as the claim against the Carrier is concerned, the record is clear
that the dispute was not handled on the property in the manner prescribed
by Section 3, First (i) of the Railway Labor Act, the time limit rule of the
applicable Agreement, or Circular No. 1 of the National Railroad Adjustment
Board. Therefore, the claim against the Carrier is barred and must be dismissed.
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon :he
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934; and
That the claim will be dismissed.
AWARD
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 17th day of May 1968.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
16314 2