NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION
(Formerly The Order of Railroad Telegraphers)
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY
(Pacific Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of The Order of Railroad Telegraphers on the Southern Pacific Company (Pacific Lines), that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The Agreement between the parties, effective December 1, 1944, as amended and supplemented, is available to your Board and by this reference is made a part hereof.
Operator J. R. Johnson, regularly assigned to a rest day relief position at King City, California, was instructed by the Carrier to protect the position of agent at Paso Robles, California, starting July 12, 1963. This placed him in the status of a regularly assigned employe required to perform relief work in accordance with Rule 9 of the Agreement which reads:
5. By letter dated October 8, 1963 (Carrier's Exhibit C), Petitioner's General Chairman appealed the claim to Carrier's Assistant Manager of Personnel, and by letter dated March 18, 1964 (Carrier's Exhibit D), Carrier's Assistant Manager of Personnel denied the claim.
OPINION OF BOARD: Rule 9 states that Claimant was to be paid "for time used in traveling." "Used" refers, in participle form, to time, and time is modified by "in traveling"-"to and from, etc." The "straight time rate" is qualified in that Claimant was to be paid only for "actual" or real time "consumed." In other words, the rule restated is: Employes shall be paid for time used in traveling to and from the position relieved, the straight time rate of their regular assigned position based upon actual time consumed.
Then, in this case, the sole question is: How much actual time was consumed in traveling by Claimant?
The Record discloses that Carrier directed Claimant to take the train and the scheduled departure was 2:55 A. M. Claimant was at the depot at said time; however, the train was late, and did not leave until 4:31 A. M.
Obviously, the Claimant, though acting in accordance with the Carrier's direction, was not, between 2:55 A. M. and 4:31 A. M., the actual time of departure as hereinbefore noted, "traveling." He was waiting to departhe was waiting to commence his journey.
This Board does not resolve the equities between the parties, but simply interprets the Agreement between the parties which they have made as a result of the collective bargaining process. Therefore, we must deny this claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and