THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-6066) that:




EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: This dispute is between the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes as the representative of the Class or Craft of employes in which the claimants in this case hold positions and the Southern Railway Company.


Under date of May 8, 1964, Mr. R. A. Nash, Clerk in the Computer Center, Atlanta, Georgia, addressed a letter to Division Chairman Mr. W. M. Flynn requesting that a claim be filed in his behalf at the proper rate of time and one-half dating back sixty (60) days from date that claim was filed, Employes' Exhibit A.


Division Chairman Mr. W. M. Flynn filed the initial claim in this case on June 15, 1964, in behalf of Messrs. C. W. Sweatmon, R. A. Nash, and P. H. Browning, Employes' Exhibit B, and stated:






DEFINITION OF EACH GROUP OF EMPLOYES

AS COVERED BY RESPECTIVE SECTIONS

OF SCOPE RULES











OPINION OF BOARD: This claim arises out of the Organization's contention that supervisory employes and supervisory trainees in Carrier's Computer Center performed the work of compiling a list of errors made on Terminal Electric Typewriters connected to receivers in said Computer Center and telephoning the various yards with instructions as to correcting said errors, which work Petitioners claim, is exclusively Clerk's work under the Scope Rule of the Agreement.


Carrier's position is the Clerks' Agreement was not violated inasmuch as. work involved herein is not clerical work, but was analytical work for the purpose of originating new instructions for the operation of new data processing equipment which was to be installed by Carrier at a later date.


A close examination of the record shows that Petitioners failed to meet. their burden of proving by probative evidence that Carrier's supervisory trainees were performing work normally and regularly performed and belong-


16452 9
ing to Clerks. This Board has held on numerous occasions that mere assertions .cannot be accepted as proof. Therefore, we must deny these claims.

FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and












Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 26th day of June 1968.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
16452 10