NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:






EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: On November 4, 7 and 8, 1966, the work of installing a switch on the Phelps Dodge Spur, 800 feet south of the main line, south of Hopkinsville, Kentucky, was performed by employes of the Carter Construction Company, none of whom hold any seniority rights under the Agreement. On December 5, 1966, the work of unloading five cars of slag at the Phelps Dodge Spur was performed by employes of the aforenamed company.


The contractor's forces consisted of one foreman and nine laborers. The Carrier furnished and delivered all of the necessary materials used in the performance of said work and provided all of the necessary equipment (trucks, a locomotive and five cars), and the operators thereof.

In view of the circumstances involved, we see no basis for the claim and it is therefore respectfully declined.







    "LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY


            Office of Director of Personnel


              Louisville, Kentucky


                        February 17, 196,7 E-201-18


    Mr. Jack Benson, General Chairman Brtoherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Nashville, Tennessee


    Dear Sir:


In our conference on February 15, 1967, we discussed your claim in favor of Mr. B. L. Raines and others, on account of the Carter Construction Company installing a switch in the Phelps Dodge Spur Track, Hopkinsville, Kentucky, November 4 through the Sth, a total of three days, and your claim for December 6 for the same employes, on account of Carter Construction Company unloading five cars of slag.


As explained to you in our conference on February 15, it is still our position that since there are no furloughed employes on the Evansville Division, all the claimants were working full time in the ranks claimed, that there is no basis for the claim and it must, therefore, stand as declined.


                      Yours truly,


                        /s/ W. S. Scholl

                        Dir. of Personnel"


Copy of the effective rules agreement between Carrier and its maintenance of way employes is on file with the Board and by reference is made a part of this submission.


OPINION OF BOARD: The issue in this case is essentially the same as that decided today in Award 16629, between the same parties. We will decide it in the same way.


    FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole

record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

    That the parties waived oral hearing;


16630 8
That the: Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and
    That the Agreement was not violated by the Carrier.


                AWARD

    Claim denied.


              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD By Order of THIRD DIVISION


              ATTEST: S. H. Schulty

              Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 11th day of October 1968.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
16630 9