4W am Award No. 16676
Docket No. SG-16947
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
John J. McGovern, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN
CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the General Committee of the
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen on the Central of Georgia Railway Company that:
(a) Carrier violated the current Signalmen's Agreement, as
amended, when it contracted with Union Switch & Signal Company
and, between October 15 and November 30, 1965, it had performed by
persons not covered by the Agreement the installation of Highway
Crossing Signals at Morrow, Georgia-between Jonesboro and Atlanta
on the territory regularly assigned to Signal Maintainer O. E.
Kitchings and Assistant Signal Maintainer J. N. Ketchem.
(b) Signal Maintainer-O. E. Kitchings
Assistant Signal Maintainer-J. N. Ketchem
Signal Foreman-T. J. Gassett
Leading Signalman -E. E. Murdock
Signalman -R. L. Johnson
Assistant Signalmen-A. T. Jones, L. B. Hardison, J. L.
Taylor, and W. D. Russell
be compensated at their respective overtime rates of pay, on a proportionate basis, for all man-hours of Signal Work performed by the
Union Switch & Signal Company's forces beginning on or about
October 15, 1965, and continuing thereafter until on or about November
30, 1965, in the installation of
Highway Crossing
Signals at Morrow,
Georgia.
[Carrier's File: SIG 489]
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS:
This claim is the result of
Carrier's contracting out work covered by the Scope of the Signalmen's Agreement. The work involved the installation of highway crossing signals at
tions contentions and conclusions being largely erroneous were flatly
denied and rejected.
In view of the exceptions taken and reasons stated to ,you at
length in conference, as well as those set forth in my letter of May
6, the claim remains declined in its entirety as per my full and final
decision of May 6, 1966."
The foregoing correspondence shows that this vague, indefinite and
improper claim was declined by each and every officer of the Carrier.
On April 16, 1965, Carrier entered into a so-called stabilization of employment agreement with employes of the signalmen's class or craft, a cony of
which agreement is on file with your Board and is, by reference, made part
and parcel of this submission as though reproduced herein word for word.
Under the April 16, 1965 agreement, all the claimants except J. N. Ketchem,
J. L. Taylor and W. D. Russell are "protected employes" and under Article IV
of such agreement are not to be placed in a worse position with respect to
compensation than the normal rate of compensation of positions to which
assigned on October 1, 1964 plus any subsequent general wage increases.
J. N. Ketchem, J. L. Taylor and W. D. Russell are all relatively new employes;
in fact, Ketchem and Russell resigned from the service in December, 1965. The
"protected employes" are guaranteed the rate of compensation received on
October 1, 1964 so long as they protect their rights and until such time as they
retire, die or are discharged for cause. Having been guaranteed lifetime pay
under the conditions outlined in the referred to agreement, they cannot expect
more.
(Exhibits not reproduced.)
OPINION OF BOARD:
Petitioner alleges a violation of the Scope Rule
of the Agreement when Carrier contracted with the Union Switch and Signal
Company to install highway crossing signals between Jonesboro and Atlanta,
Georgia.
The parties and the issue are identical to those discussed in our Award
16675. In essence, as we view the claim as submitted, it is vague and indefinite
and would require the Carrier to develop the claim to give it a degree of
specificity which it is now lacking. For the foregoing reason and for the reasons
stated in the above award, we will dismiss the claim.
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are Tespectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein.
16676 11
AWARD
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive
Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of October 1968.
DISSENT TO AWARDS NOS. 16675 AND 16676
DOCKETS SG-17018 AND 16947
The Majority's
holdings that the claims presented in Awards Nos. 16675
and 16676 are vague and indefinite area mockery of our purpose and in conflict with others of our Awards involving the present as well as other parties.
Awards Nos. 16675 and 16676 being in error, we dissent.
W. W. Altus, Jr.
For Labor
Members
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed in U.S.A.
16676 12