BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND STEAMSHIP
CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND
STATION EMPLOYES
OPINION OF BOARD: On August 25, 1964, the Carrier's Superintendent issued notice that a General Clerk's position at Newport, Arkansas, would be abolished at the end of tour of duty on September 4, 1964. The Petitioner contends that in making changes in hours of assignment of the remaining clerical forces and re-arranging the clerical work, approximately four hours of such work was transferred to the Star Agent-Telegrapher, which it alleges violated the applicable Agreement covering clerical employes.
The Carrier denied the claim on the ground that clerks do not have an exclusive right to all clerical work at Newport or at any other station on the system, and that at Newport, as at numerous other stations on the system, clerical work has been and continues to be performed by clerks, telegraphers and others.
Numerous Awards of this Division and Awards of Special Boards of Adjustment have been cited by the parties in support of their respective positions.
The more recent, and, in our opinion, better reasoned Awards of the Division, have, in interpreting general type Scope Rules such as involved herein, applied the principle of determining whether or not the work in dispute has been performed solely and exclusively by employee covered by the Petitioner's Agreement through custom, tradition and past practice on the Carrier's system, and that the burden of proving such sole and exclusive right through custom, tradition and practice, is on the Petitoner. (Awards 15458, 14593, 14327, 14944, among others.)
Furthermore, the queston of whether work formerly done by employee under the Clerks' Agreement, due to reduction in forces, can be assigned to employes under the Telegraphers' Agreement, has been before this Board many times. See Award 14085 and others cited therein.
The Petitioner had the burden of proving that the work assigned to the Star Agent-Telegrapher belonged exclusively to the Clerks under their Agreement. This it has failed to do.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Aet, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and