THIRD DIVISION

(Supplemental)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY AND STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES




STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-6318) that:



EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: This dispute is between the Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes as the representative of the Class or Craft of employes in which the claimant in this case holds position and the Southern Railway Company.


Mr. Bryce P. Smith is carrier on the Southern Railway System, Eastern Lines, Charlotte-Columbia Division, Charlotte District, Seniority RosterGroup 3 Crew Callers-Messenger, with a seniority date of March 14, 1951. He, at the time of this claim, had been an employe of the Southern Railway Company for more than fourteen (14) years.


For many years there were three shifts of Crew Caller Messengers at Greenville, South Carolina. Mr. Bryce P. Smith was regularly assigned to the third shift Crew Caller-Messenger assignment until it was abolished, leaving two shifts, first and second, with four (4) days relief work each week which was performed by Mr. Smith.


Due to a reduction in the number of crews necessary to be called at Greenville, the work of bulletining train and engine service vacancies on the South End, Charlotte Division, which is Group 1 clerical work, was assigned to Crew Callers. Claim was filed for this violation of our Agreement and is



DEFINITION OF EACH GROUP OF EMPLOYES AS

COVERED BY RESPECTIVE SECTIONS

OF SCOPE RULES.













OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, an Extra Crew Caller and a Group No. 3 Employe, worked Thursday and Friday 9:00 P. M. to 6:00 A. M., Saturday and Sunday 7:00 A. M. to 4:00 P. M., a four-day week. Carrier changed Claimant's hours to 9:00 P. M. to 6:00 A. M., Thursday, Friday, and Saturday, a three day week, and assigned a Yard Clerk, a Group No. 1 Employe, then working 7:00 A. M. to 3:00 P. M. Sundays, to relieve the Crew Caller Sundays 7:00 A. M. to 4:00 P. M.


Prior thereto, the Carrier had agreed that Claimant's position of Crew Caller would remain in Group No. 3 until vacated by him, after which the position would be designated a Group No. 1 clerical position. (Letter Agree ment of July 14, 1965.)


Carrier contends no violation occurred because the Extra Crew Caller was not needed and that the position was primarily Group No. 1 clerical work.


16878 10
Due to the prior Letter Agreement of the Carrier the Board finds that e violation has occurred anti that the claim should be allowed.

FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and










Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 24th day of January, 1969.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
16978 It