NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
John J. McGovern, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY
(Pacific Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the
Transportation-Communication Employees Union on the Southern Pacific
Company (Pacific Lines), that:
CLAIM NO. 1
1. The Carrier violated the terms and intent of the current
Telegraphers' Agreement when it required D. B. Hatch, Relief AgentTelegrapher, Westwood, California, to perform relief work as agenttelegrapher, Susanville, California, June 26 to July 5, 1963, inclusive, when no emergency as defined under Rule 9 existed and did not
pay him under applicable rules and at applicable rates for this
service.
2. As a consequence of these violations, the Carrier now shall
be required to:
(a) Make D. B. Hatch whole under Rule 9 in accordance with Carrier's contention that this was emergency service by paying him actual necessary expenses while away
from his regular assigned stations, and at the straight time
rate of his regular assigned position for all time consumed
in traveling to and from the position relieved (with a maximum of eight (3) hours' travel pay in each twenty-four
hour period), both as presented by him; and by paying him
the difference between the earnings of his regular assigned
position and his earnings as agent-telegrapher, Susanville,
June 26 to July 5, 1963, inclusive, exclusive of expenses and
travel time.
NOTE: In accordance with District Chairman Ward's letter
dated September 6, 1963, reference to Superintendent's File 013-252, it was determined in conference between Mr. Ward and Mr. Degroot, Chief
Timekeeper, that Claimant Hatch was made whole
and fully paid in accordance with Rule 9 as requested in paragraph 2(a) above.
(b) After Mr. Hatch has been made whole in accordance
with (2) above, then compensate him as follows in accordance with this Organization's contention that this was nonemergency service, taking credit for the amount already paid
to him for each date:
Wednesday and Thursday, June 26 and 27: Eight (8) hours
overtime rate of agent-telegrapher, Susanville, for service performed off assignment, no emergency, on an assigned rest day of his regular assigned position.
Friday, June 28: Seven (7) hours pro rata rate third telegrapher-clerk-towerman, Wendel, California, as the guarantee of his regular assigned position; plus eight (8)
hours regular rate of agent-telegrapher, Susanville, for
service performed off assignment, no emergency.
Monday and Tuesday, July 1 and 2: Seven and one-half
(7%) hours pro rata rate second telegrapher-clerk,
Westwood, California, as the guarantee of his regular
assigned position, plus eight (8) hours regular rate
agent-telegrapher, Susanville, service performed off assignment, no emergency.
Wednesday, July 3: Eight (8) hours overtime rate of agenttelegrapher, Susanville, for service performed off assignment, no emergency, on a rest day of his regular assigned position.
Thursday, July 4: A holiday-eight (8) hours pro rata rate
agent-telegrapher, Susanville, holiday compensation.
Friday, July 5: Seven (7) hours pro rata rate third telegrapher-clerk-towerman, Wendel, as the guarantee of his
regular assigned position; plus four (4) hours regular
rate agent-telegrapher, Susanville, for making of agency
transfer.
(Organization File: BU 9851-53)
(Committee File: C.578.3)
(Carrier File: TEL 61-314)
CLAIM NO. 2
1. Carrier violated the provisions of the Telegraphers' Agreement, Rules 3, 5 and 15, on October 11, 12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 1963,
at Bisbee Junction, Arizona, when regularly assigned employe,
relief position, Douglas, Arizona, was required to perform service on
other than his regular assigned relief position under conditions
which did not constitute an emergency.
2. Claim in behalf of H. H. Stemple, regularly assigned traveling relief position, headquarters Douglas, Arizona, whose assigned
hours are as follows:
16918 2
Thursday and Friday, telegrapher-ticket clerk-cashier, Bisbee, 8:00 A. M. to 12:00 Noon and from 1:00 P. M. to
5:00 P. M.
Saturday, agent-telegrapher, Bisbee Junction, 8:00 A. M. to
12:00 Noon and from 1:00 P. M. to 5:00 P. M.
Sunday and Monday, first telegrapher-clerk, Douglas, 7:00
A. M. to 12:00 Noon and from 1:00 P. M. to 4:00 P. M.
Tuesday and Wednesday, rest days, for additional compensation
as follows:
Eight (8) hours at the pro rata rate applicable for telegrapher-ticket clerk-cashier, Bisbee, Arizona for each date
October 11, 17 and 18, 1963.
Eight (8) hours at the pro rata rate applicable for agenttelegrapher, Bisbee Junction, Arizona for each date
October 12 and 19, 1963.
Eight (8) hours at the pro rata rate applicable for
first
telegrapher-clerk, Douglas, Arizona, for each date October 14, 20 and 21, 1963.
(Organization File: BU 9845-53)
(Committee File: 8.397.3)
(Carrier File: TEL 61-341)
CLAIM NO. 3
1. Carrier violated the provisions of the Telegraphers' Agreement, Rules 3, 5 and 15, on July 11 and 12, 1962, at Los Banos,
California, when it required R. J. Roup, regularly assigned Relief
No. 13, to work off his regular assignment under conditions which
did not constitute an emergency.
2. Claim in behalf of R. J. Roup, regular assigned Relief Position No. 13, whose headquarters at Chowchilla, and whose assigned
hours are as follows:
Tuesday 3rd Teleg: Clk. Los Banos 11:00 P. M. 7:00 A. M.
Wednesday 3rd Teleg: Clk. Los Banos 11:00 P. M.-7:00 A. M.
Thursday 3rd Teleg: Clk. Chowchilla 11:00 P. M. 7:00 A. M.
Friday 3rd Teleg: Clk. Chowchilla 11:00 P. M. 7:00 A. M.
Saturday Agent-Teleg. Chowchilla 7:00 A. M.-3:00 P. M.
Sunday Rest Day
Monday Rest Day
for eight (8) hours at the pro rata rate of his regular assignment
third telegrapher-clerk, Los Banos, July 11, 1962; and eight (8)
hours at the pro rata rate of his regular assignment third telegrapher-clerk, Chowchilla, July 12, 1962. Rate $2.5953 per hour.
(Organization File: BU 8916-53)
(Committee File: E.589.3)
(Carrier File: TEL 61-253)
16918 3
CLAIM NO. 4
1. The Carrier violated the provisions of the Telegraphers' Agree-
ment, Rules 3, 5, 9 and 15, on December 21, 1962, at Watsonville
Junction, California, when F. F. Kinisky, a regularly assigned employe, Relief Position 20, was required to perform work outside
the hours of his regular assigned position under conditions which
did not constitute an emergency.
2. Claim in behalf of F. F. Kinisky, regular assigned Relief
Position No. 20, Watsonville Junction, California, whose assigned
hours are at Watsonville Junction as follows:
Friday 3rd Wire Chief-Telgr: Clerk 12:00 MN - 8:00 A. M.
Saturday let Wire Chief-Telgr.-Clerk 8:00 A. M.- 4:00 P. M.
Sunday let Wire Chief-Telgr: Clerk 8:00 A. M.- 4:00 P. M.
Monday 2nd Wire Chief-Telgr.-Clerk 4:00 P. M.-12:00 MN
Tuesday 2nd Wire Chief-Telgr: Clerk 4:00 P. M: 12:00 MN
Wednesday Rest Day
Thursday Rest Day
for eight (8) hours' pay at the pro rata rate of his position at
Watsonville Junction for December 21, 1962.
(Organization File: MU 8905-53)
(Committee File: 6.593.3)
(Carrier File: TEL 61-276)
CLAIM NO. 5
1. Carrier violated the provisions of the Telegraphers' Agreement, Rules 3, 5 and 15 on August 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17,
18, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31 and September 1, 1962,
at Colton, California, when it failed and refused to properly compensate L. G. Cundiff, regular assigned wire chief-telegrapher-clerk
PMO, Relief Position No. 16, Colton, California, after it had required him to work off his regular assignment under circumstances
which did not constitute an emergency.
2. Claim in behalf of L. G. Cundiff, regular assigned Relief
Position No. 16, all at Colton, California, whose assigned hours are:
Thursday 3rd W/C Telegrapher-Clerk-PMO 11:00 PM-7:00 AM
Friday 3rd W/C Telegrapher-Clerk-PMO 11:00 PM-7:00 AM
Saturday 1st W/C TelegrapherClerk-PMO 7:00 AM-3:00 PM
Sunday 1st W/C Telegrapher-Clerk-PMO 7:00 AM-3:00 PM
Monday 2nd W/C Telegrapher-Clerk-PMO 3:00 PM-11:00 PM
Tuesday and Wednesday: Rest Days.
for an additional eight (8) hours' pay at pro rata rate for each date
August 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27,
30, 31 and September 1, 1962, paid for but not worked, account work-
16918 4
ing
off his regular assignment; for eight (8) hours at the overtime
rate for each date August 22, 29 for the rest days of his own assignment, less any amount already paid for those dates.
(Organization File: BU 8909-53)
(Committee File: 1.543.3)
(Carrier File: TEL-61-260) NOTE: Incorrectly listed as TEL
61-242 in November 22,
1965 Advance Notice.
CLAIM N0.6
1. Carrier violated the provisions of the Telegraphers' Agreement, Rules 3, 5, 9 and 15, on March 12 and 13, 1963, at Guadalupe,
California, when it failed and refused to properly compensate S. A.
Free, regular assigned manager-wire chief-telegrapher-clerk, San Luis
Obispo, California, when it required him to work off his regular
assignment under circumstances which did not constitute an emergency.
2. Claim in behalf of S. A. Free, regularly assigned managerwire chief-telegrapher-clerk, San Luis Obispo, California, whose assigned hours are from 8:00 A. M. to 4:00 P. M. daily, Monday
through Friday, with rest days Saturday and Sunday, for eight (8)
hours per day at the pro rata rate of manager-wire chief-telegrapher-clerk, San Luis Obispo, paid for but not worked for March 12
and 13, 1963.
(Organization File: BU 9865-53)
(Committee File: 6.596.3)
(Carrier File: TEL 61-288)
]EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS:
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The basic and underlying cause for these claims stems from a contention of the Employes that Carrier has engaged upon a "no hiring" campaign
in 1961 with the end result that the complement of extra employes required to
perform relief service on vacancies due to various causes (vacation, illness,
military service, leave of absence, etc.) is far short of that needed, whereby
Carrier is repeatedly diverting regular employes from their regular assignments and causing them to perform relief service under the guise of "emergency."
Rule 15 of the parties' Agreement reads as follows:
"Employes shall not be required to suspend work during regular
hours or to absorb overtime."
Rule 9 of the parties' Agreement confirms the non-removal principle of
diverting regularly assigned employes for relief work under Rule 15, but
makes an exception thereto in bona fide cases of emergency. This Rule 9
16918 5
Copies of the correspondence exchanged between the parties during the
handling of these claims on the property are attached as:
Exhibit "A" covering Claim No. 1
Exhibit "B" covering Claim No. 2
Exhibit "C" covering Claim No. 3
Exhibit "D" covering Claim No. 4
Exhibit "E" covering Claim No. 5
Exhibit "F" covering Claim No. 6
(Exhibits not reproduced.)
OPINION OF BOARD:
This case consists of six separate claims, five
of which involve an interpretation of Rule 9, the emergency relief rule,
which in pertinent part reads as follows:
"RULE 9.
REGULAR ASSIGNED EMPLOYES PERFORMING
RELIEF WORK
Regular assigned employes shall not be required to perform
relief work except in cases of emergency.
a s s ~ ,
# t
a f *"
In Claims 1, 4, 5 and 6, temporary relief service was performed because
of the illness of the employe to be relieved. No extra men were available.
We can see no substance to the argument that unforeseen illness of an employe does not constitute an emergency as envisioned by the above cited rule.
An emergency did exist, and Carrier was correct in its action. We will deny
Claims 1, 4, 5 and 6.
In Claim No. 2, the Organization's District Chairman took time off to
handle Organization business, giving Carrier a two-day notice. Again, there
were no extra men available. Due to the shortage of the notice given, we hold
that this situation constituted an emergency as envisioned by Rule 9. We will
deny Claim No. 2.
Claim No. 3 does not involve emergency service. A regularly assigned
employe was required to work on other than his assigned position during his
regularly assigned hours. The claim is for dual compensation. Petitioner has
based this claim on the Guarantee Rule. A review of the record, insofar as
this claim is concerned, convinces us that the contracting parties never intended dual compensation in this type of situation. The interpretation given
this rule over the years dictates a decision contrary to that demanded by the
Organization. We will deny Claim No. 3.
FINDINGS:
The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
16918 28
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
AWARD
Claims denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOAlW
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 29th day of January 1969.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.y.A
16918 29