Award No. 17107
Docket No. CL-17525

NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

THIRD DIVISION

(SUPPLEMENTAL)




PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND STEAMSHIP

CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND STATION

EMPLOYES

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brother lGL-6423) that:



EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: On Monday, October 3, 1966, there was a one day temporary vacancy on the position of Relief Clerk No. 2 scheduled to fill Job No. 1058 at St. Joseph, Missouri that was caused by the regular occupant thereof, Mr. W. B. Sexton, being set up to work as Ticket Clerk due to the absence of the Ticket Clerk.



.Job No. 1058, Mail Handler, Sunday-Monday, 10:00 A.M. to 1:00 P.M. and 3:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M.


Job No. 1361, Janitor-Mail Handler, Tuesday-Wednesday, 10:00 A.M. to 3:00 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M.




The following qualified employes with seniority rights to the work on Job No. 1058 were available for use on Monday, October 3, 1966:

Mr. Duncan holds a seniority date of September 28, 1960 on the St. Joseph Zone of the Ottumwa Division as a crossing flagman. His position as crossing flagman was abolished on March 23, 1966. (See Carrier's Exhibit No. 2) Since that time, Mr. Duncan has been used to protect crossing flagman, janitor and section laborer vacancies on a temporary basis as these vacancies occurred through vacations, sickness or other reasons.


On May 15, 1967, Mr. Duncan resumed work as a full-time section laborer following lay off. (See Carrier's Exhibit No. 3) On this date, he was rehired to fill an authorized section laborer position. Heretofore, he was used as an extra temporary section laborer. He was officially in a laidoff status from March 23, 1966 to May 15, 1967. He could have accepted employment elsewhere during this period of time. Instead, he chose to keep himself available to be used as a temporary extra section laborer, crossing flagman clerk, janitor, or anything else the Carrier felt he might be qualified to do.




OPINION OF BOARD: The evidence presented in this claim contains conflicting contentions and is insufficient as to material facts. In view thereof the Board must dismiss the claim.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respec tively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and














Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of May 1969.

Central Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 46206 Printed in U.S.A.

17107 4