STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen on the Colorado and Southern Railway Company that:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Because of illness of H. C. Ross, headquartered at Cheyenne, Wyoming, a vacancy existed on his position of Division Lineman from June 5 to July 3, 1967, or 28 days.
Vacancies have been filed under provisions of Rules 30 and 32 of the Agreement in such a manner as to prompt the Local Chairman to state, "* " * Rules 30 and 32, of the April 16, 1944 Agreement between the Colorado & Southern By. Co. and the Brotherhood of Railway [sic] Signalmen, have predicated a historic and traditional precedent, relative to vacancies and sick leave from April 16, 1944 until the unilateral and arbitrary blanking of the vacancy at Cheyenne, Wyoming by the Colorado & Southern Railway Company on June 5, 1967." This statement was not disputed by the carrier.
Rule 32 of the Agreement between the Colorado and Southern Railway Company and the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen reads as follows:
Because of pole line damage resulting from an ice storm, the signal gang to which the three named claimants were members was thoroughly occupied and required to work overtime as a result of the storm damage, consequently, there was no " . available qualified extra men . . ." as contemplated in Agreement Rule 32, thus the agreement does not require filling such vacancy.
OPINION OF BOARD: The issue here is whether or not Carrier violated Rule 32 of the Agreement when it failed to fill a position temporarily vacant for less than 30 days, due to illness of the regular occupant thereof.
This Board has held on numerous occasions that Management in regard to manpower requirements has the sole prerogative to determine in its judgment whether or not vacant position is to be filled, unless forbidden by law or contract. See Award Nos. 12358, 12686, 14252, 15046, 15633 and many others. Finding nothing in the agreement which requires Carrier to fill the temporarily vacant position in question, we must deny the claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and