NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
(Supplemental)
Paul C. Dugan, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND STEAM
SHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS AND
STATION EMPLOYES
STATEMENT OF CLAIM:
Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood (GL-6418) that:
(a) Carrier violated the Agreement at Greenville, South Carolina,
when it failed to use Mr. R. H. Grant, Group 1 Mail and Baggage
Foreman, on his rest days to fill the vacancy of Group 1 Mail
and Baggage Foreman, Mr. W. R. Dixon, who was off due to
illness and the position was being filled under the provisions of
Rule 17 of the Clerks' Agreement, using instead a Group 5 Mail
and Baggage Handler, who holds no Group 1 seniority.
(b) Air. Grant shall be compensated at the rate of time and one-half
$.p22.92 per day for each date, June 9, 10, 16, 17, 23, 24, 30, July 1,
7 and 9, 1966.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: This dispute is between the
Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers,
Express and Station Employes as the representative of the Class or Craft of
employes in which the claimant in this case held position and the Southern
Railway Company.
Mx. R. H. Grant was carried on the Southern Railway System, Eastern
Lines-Charlotte-Columbia Division, Seniority Roster-Group 1, Clerks, with
a seniority date of June 26, 1945. He at the time of his claim had approximately twenty-one years of service.
Group 1 Mail and Baggage Foreman Mr. W. R. Dixon was off due to
sickness. His assignment of Monday through Friday, with Saturday and Sunday as rest days, was being filled at the overtime rate of time and one-half
by other Group 1 employes who were observing their rest days. Mr. R. H.
Grant, with rest days of Thursday and Friday, was filling Mr. Dixon's
vacancy on those days each week. Beginning with the week of May 30, 1966,
Mr. Willie Warren, a Group 5 Mail and Baggage Handler, was stepped up to
fill the vacancy of Mail and Baggage Foreman, created by the illness of
Mr. W. R. Dixon. Regularly assigned Group 1 employes were not allowed
any more overtime on this vacancy.
blanked for all or any part of the period of the vacancy; should such
position be filled it may be done at the discretion of the officer in
charge.
NOTE No. 1: When such temporary vacancies are filled, either
for the entire or portion thereof, as provided in Rule 8, preference
for such work shall be given to employees holding seniority in
group or class in which vacancy occurs, but this privilege does not
extend to employees in other groups or classes unless an employee
holds seniority in the group or class in which vacancy occurs.
s x x
"Rule A6-Preservation of Rates and Employment
(a)
(Effective June 1, 1921) Employees temporarily or permanently assigned to higher rated positions shall receive the higher
rates while occupying such positions-; employees temporarily assigned
to lower rated positions shall not have their rates reduced. A `temporary assignment' contemplates the fulfillment of the duties and
responsibilities of the position during the time occupied, whither
the regular occupant of the position is absent or whether the
temporary assignee does the work irrespective of the presence of
regular employee. Assisting a higher rated employee due to a
temporary increase in the volume of work does not constitute a
temporary assignment.
k k :k»
(Exhibits not reproduced.)
OPINION OF BOARD:
The undisputed facts in this case are that a
Group 1 Mail and Baggage Foreman's position became temporarily vacant
due to illness of the regular occupant thereof, W. R. Dixon. This position has
regular assigned work days of Monday through Friday with Saturday and
Sunday as rest days. Claimant filled the position as part of his regular
assignment on said rest days of the regular occupant thereof. Carrier used a
Group 5 Mail and Baggage Handler, Willie Warren, temporarily to fill the
said vacant Mail and Baggage Foreman position, and the use of said
Group 5 employe brought about this instant claim.
It is the Organization's position that the provisions of Rule 17 of the
Agreement prohibit such action by Carrier.
Rule 17, the pertinent parts thereof, provide:
"Temporary Vacancies (Revised, effective October 1, 1938)
Temporary vacancies of thirty (30) days or less, or temporary
vacancies up to ninety (90) days, when occasioned by the granting
of leave of absence or absence on account of sickness, may be
blanked for all or any part of the period of the vacancy; should
such position be filled it may be done at the discretion of the
officer in charge.
NOTE No. 1: When such temporary vacancies are filled, either for
the entire period of portion thereof, as provided in Rule 8, pref-
17115 11
erence for such work shall be given to employees holding seniority
in group or class in which vacancy occurs, but this privilege does
not extend to employees in other groups or classes unless an employee
holds seniority in the group or class in which vacancy occurs."
This Board in Award No. 4533, in interpreting a similar rule as said
Rule 17 herein, said:
"It is clear to us that under Rule 5(d) the Carrier can fill
temporary vacancies occasioned by leaves of absence or sick leave,
or it may blank them as it sees fit. The note attached to the rules
permits the Carrier to use its own judment as to the employe to
be used in case it elects to fill the vacancy, except that it must be
an employe holding seniority in the class or group in which the
vacancy occurs, or an employe in another group or class who also has
seniority in the class or group where the vacancy existed . . .
Therefore, inasmuch as Carrier filled the vacancy in question with an
employe who did not hold seniority in Group 1, where the vacancy existed,
Carrier violated the Agreement and the Claim must be sustained.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving
the parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
AWARD
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 2nd day of May 1969.
Central Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 46206 Printed in U.S.A.
17115 12