NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen on the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company:
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Claimant is R. E. Hickerson, vacation relief signal maintainer whose headquarters are H. D. Interlocking Tower, Joliet, Illinois with assigned working days Monday through Friday, Saturday and Sunday rest days.
Claimant was assigned to relieve a vacationing employe at MC Tower Joliet, Illinois which is another headquarters point some distance from his regular headquarters point, and a subject of the March 11, 1966 Memorandum of Agreement between the parties to this dispute.
In compliance with Rule 13 of the current Signalmen's Agreement, Claimant reported each morning at his regular headquarters point (H.D. Interlocking Tower) in sufficient time to travel to his relief headquarters point MC Tower, and arrive at the regular starting time of the position, 7:00 A.M. Claimant left his relief headquarters point each afternoon at his regular quitting time 4:00 P.M., and arrived at his home station headquarters point at 4:30 P.M., 30 minutes after his regular quitting time.
The time accumulated in travel between the two headquarters points was one (1) hour each day, which when claimed, Carrier refused to pay and is the reason for this claim.
As can be seen by the correspondence, the dispute has been handled in the usual and proper manner on the property, up to and including the highest officer of the Carrier designated to handle such disputes, without receiving a satisfactory settlement.
Pertinent correspondence has been reproduced and attached hereto, identified as Brotherhood's Exhibits Nos. 1 through 11.
6. To avoid burdening the record, Carrier has not included copies of the correspondence presented on the property concerning this claim as it is anticipated the Brotherhood will produce such correspondence as a part of its submission. However, Carrier will refer to various portions of this correspondence, as necessary, and will reproduce pertinent portions of same when appropriate. Carrier will also take exception in its rebuttal statement to any errors or omissions in the Brotherhood's reproduction of such correspondence.
7. The procedures followed in the progression of this claim were timely and in accordance with the applicable rules in effect on this property and the Railway Labor Act, as amended.
OPINION OF BOARD: On March 11, 1966, the parties entered into Memorandum of Agreement reading in part as follows:
Claimant was assigned to the relief position with home station at U.D. Tower. On the dates involved in the claim he was assigned to relieve the signal maintainer at M. C. Tower, within Joliet Terminal, whose assigned working hours were 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., each day.
The Employes contend that in order for Claimant to begin and end his time at his home station headquarters, U. D. Tower, and also to work from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the M. C. Tower, he had no choice but to arrive at U. D. Tower (home station) in sufficient time to travel to M. C. Tower (vacation relief point) by regular work time, and to travel after
quitting time in order to return to U. D. Tower (home station) to end his time in accordance with Rule 13. The Employes contend that the travel time amounted to one hour each day.
In its initial denial of the claim on the property, the Communications and Signal Supervisor stated to Claimant:
However, the record contains no evidence of instructions having been issued to Claimant that he was not to work the assigned hours of the position on which he was performing vacation relief. Also, the highest appeals officer of the Carrier stated that it was "relying on the 'past practice' in not allowing travel time under the conditions claimed in your appeal." The record contains no evidence of practice so far as the job here involved is concerned, and the Board has held many times that the party relying upon practice must prove such practice.
In the opinion of the Board the rules relied upon support the contention of the Claimant under the circumstances here involved and we will sustain the claim, limiting allowance to the named Claimant for the specific dates mentioned in the Statement of Claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and