NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND
STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS,
EXPRESS AND STATION EMPLOYES
THE INDIANAPOLIS UNION RAILWAY COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood (CL-6572) that:
1. The Carrier violated the terms of the current Clerks' Agreement
and
supplements thereto on December 1, 1967, when work was
required to be performed and employes assigned to and working
in the Mail and Baggage Department were not called to work
overtime but instead Carrier called employes from other departments to work overtime in violation of the Agreement.
2. (a) Walter R. Briner shall now be paid. for 8 hours at the
overtime rate of Baggage and Mail Handler for December
1, 1967.
(b) Fred Henning shall now be paid for 8 hours at the overtime rate of Baggage and Mail Handler for December 1,
1967.
(c) Bobby Scotten shall now be paid for 8 hours at the overtime rate of Foreman for December 1, 1967.
(d) James L. Stogdill shall now be paid for 8 hours at the
overtime rate of Baggage and Mail Handler for December
1, 1967.
(e) C. R. Wilson shall now be paid for 8 hours at the
overtime
rate of Baggage and Mail Handler for December 1, 1967.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: Claimants are the incumbents of regular assigned positions as B & M Handlers in the Mail Room at
the Indianapolis Union Station, with the exception of claimant Scotten who
is a Track Foreman at the same location. On the date of claim, December
1, 1967, the volume of mail to be handled had increased considerably and
Carrier had determined it needed additional workers beyond the regular
work force.
However, instead of calling the five claimants to work overtime it elected
to use two employes from Accounting, two employes from the Ticket Office
and one employe from the Belt Shops. Their regular assignments ended from
4:30 P.M. through 6:30 P.M. and all were required to double over.
In contrast all of the claimants had eight hours or more rest, their
previous tour having terminated from 6:30 A.M. through 8:25 A.M., and
they were more fully acquainted with the work since they held regular
assignments in the Mail Room as B & M Handler or as a Track Foreman.
The claims were filed by the employes on December 2, 1967, and denied
by the Carrier, the Local Chairman appealed the claims on March 1, 1968,
and, being declined, was timely appealed to Carrier's highest officer designated to receive and consider such appeals. Conference was held on May
14 and July 27, 1968. Copies of all correspondence in connection with
these claims are attached and identified as Employes' Exhibits "A"
through "J".
(Exhibits not reproduced)
CARRIER'S STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Due to an increase in volume
of mail at the start of the 1967 Christmas season, it was necessary to
bolster the mail handling force on Tour 3, or second trick, December 1,
1967. Five (5) employes made up from the Ticket Office and Accounting
Office were used. Employes from these departments were and are members
of the Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, Freight
Handlers, Express and Station Employes, and are in the Group I classification.
Employes from these departments and occasionally other departments,
have been used in this same manner prior to 1967 without complaint from
the Organization. An example of this: on Friday, October 14, 1966, one
employee from the Ticket Office was used and two from the Accounting
Department; October 19, 1966, two employes from the Accounting Department; October 20, 1966, one from the Ticket Office, five from the Accounting Department; October 22, 1966, one clerk from the Belt Shops;
October 28, 1966, four employes from the Accounting Department; October
29, 1966, one clerk from the Belt Shops.
Not only were employes used in 1966, but also in years prior to this,
and no complaint from the Organization.
On December 1, 1967, on Tour 1, or third trick, we used two extra
men, three regular men day off extra, one regular man on birthday holiday
and one regular day off man, to fill a regular assignment. On Tour 2,
first trick, we used three regular day off men extra, four regular day off
men, to fill regular assignments. On Tour 3, second trick, we used one
regular day off man to fill a regular assignment, one regular day off man
extra and six extra men, including five from the Accounting Department
and Ticket Office.
In addition to this, the three tricks made a total of
twenty-six (26) hours' overtime.
OPINION OF BOARD: The circumstances which gave rise to this
claim are not in dispute.
Due to an increase in volume of mail at the start of the 1967 Christmas
season, Carrier found it necessary to supplement the personnel on the mail
17373 2
handling force on Tour 3, or second trick, December 1, 1967. For this purpose,
it assigned two employees from Accounting, two from Ticket Office and one
from the Belt Shops. The regular assignment of these employees had ended
at 4:30 P.M. to 6:30 P.M. (that is, the immediately preceeding shifts);
thus they continued on the additional hours as overtime.
Claimants had completed preceeding tours ending 6:30 A.M. through
8:25 A.M. Four occupied regular assignments in the Mail Room as Baggage
and Mail Handlers and one as Troock Foreman. They claim 8 hours at the
overtime rate for each on the following grounds:
Agreement Rules 42 and 43 which read as follows:
"RULE 42-OVERTIME
"(f) Work on unassigned Days. Where work is required by the
Carrier to be performed on a day which is not a part of any assignment, it may be performed by an available extra or unassigned
employe who will otherwise not have 40 hours of work that week;
in all other cases by the regular employe."
"(g) Except where it is otherwise agreed between the Management and General or Local Chairman, in working overtime before or
after assigned hours or on call under Rule 43, employes regularly
assigned to the positions on which overtime is necessary shall be
given preference; the same principle shall apply in working extra
time on holidays. (added effective January 1, 1956)"
"RULE 43-NOTIFIED OR CALLED
"Employes notified or called to perform work not continuous
with, before or after their regular work period, or on Sundays and
specified holidays, shall be allowed the minimum of three (3) hours
for two (2) hours work or less, and if held on duty in excess of
two hours, time and one-half will be allowed on the minute basis.
Employes who have completed their regular tour of duty and have
been releas^d, required to return for further service, may, if the
conditions justify, be compensated as if on continuous duty."
Supplement No. 1 of Memorandum of Agreement between the parties
which provides:
"It is understood and agreed that in the event there is extra
work in the Baggage and Mail Department that cannot be taken care
of by the regular force or extra force or by the employment of new
employes, and after the regular force and extra force have been permitted to work what overtime they desire, employes on other assignments and employes of other departments coming under the same
seniority roster may be permitted to work outside of the assigned
hours of their regular position in the Baggage and Mail Department
and will be paid for such service at the time and one-half rate
based on rate of the position worked."
Carrier takes the position that Rule 42(g) does not obligate it to use
employes in advance of their regular assignments and that employes and
Organization have acquiesced in such interpretation by being parties to repeated practice of Carrier in using other employes for run-on overtime,
rather than position occupants for pre-shift overtime.
17373 1
Organization denies that this had been the practice and contends that
even if it had been, does not vitiate the clear meaning of governing
Agreement terms.
Organization submits also a bulletin issued by Carrier dated December
9, 1966, which reads in part as follows:
"Effective December 10, 1966 at 6:00 A.M. and until further
notice all U.S. Mail Room Employes will work their days off as
long us the volume of U.S. Mail is sufficient. No employees will
be off without permission of the General Foreman."
We find the language of Rule 42(f) and (g) clear as an expression of
intent that "employes regularly assigned to the positions on which overtime
is necessary shall be given preference" in "working before or after assigned
hours". The record in the instant claim shows that the Claimants were
denied such preference. The claims made must therefore be sustained.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
AWARD
Claim sustained
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this Ist ady of August 1969.
Central Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 46206 Printed in U.S.A.
17373 4