PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILWAY, AIRLINE AND

STEAMSHIP CLERKS, FREIGHT HANDLERS, EXPRESS

AND STATION EMPLOYES


THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-6592) that:








OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant was required to attend investigation involving four separate charges, one of which pertained to violation of Rule "G" concerning the use of intoxicants during his lunch period. Review of the record discloses sufficient evidence to support a finding of guilty of the violation of Rule "G". As to the other three charges our review indicates that Claimant was not required to answer to the second charge by reason of it being dropped from the original list of charges by the Hearing Officer during the investigation. As to the first and fourth charge the evidence is not sufficient to support an unqualified finding of guilty.


Under the circumstances shown by the record in this dispute the violation of Rule "G" does not support the extreme penalty of dismissal from

service. We find the penalty imposed by Carrier is excessive and should tie reduced. Claimant should be restored to service with seniority and other rights unimpaired, but without compensation for time lost.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and


That the Agreement has been violated only to the extent sho«-n in the Opinion.




Claim sustained to the extent indicated in the Opinion and denied in other respects.








Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of October 1969.

Central Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 46206 Printed in U.S.A.

17564 2