-~- Award Number 17795
Docket Number MW-18418
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Francis X. Quinn, Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the
Brotherhood that:
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it called and used
B&B employes from the C.V. Division to perform bridge work
on the K & A Division instead of calling and using cut-off
K & A Division B&B employes. (System file 1-5).
(2) Foreman H. E. Dalton, Carpenters E. R. White and L. H. Melton, Helpers J. P. Perion, W. H. Ellis and Laborer C. L. Manery
each be allowed eight (8) hours' pay at their respective rates
because of the violation referred to within Part (1) of this claim.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: The claimants are cut-off
employes who hold seniority within their respective classes of the B&B
sub-department. Their seniority is confined to the Knoxville and Atlanta
Division in accordance with the provisions of Rule 4 which reads in pertinent
part:
"SENIORITY DISTRICTS
The seniority rights of employes are confined to their respective
seniority districts, as follows:
4(b) For employes in the Bridge and Building Sub-departments,
including pump repairmen, and their helpers; Cincinnati Division;
Eastern Kentucky Division; Cumberland Valley Division, Knoxville
and Atlanta Division; Louisville Division, Louisville to Mile
Post 174 and Lebanon Branch, Lebanon Junction to Sinks, Kentucky;
Evansville Division; Nashville Terminals; Nashville Division Former
NC&StL Railway west of Nashville, Tennessee, and Memphis Subdivision, from Memphis, Tennessee, to Mile Post 118; Birmingham
Division, including former NC&StL Railway Line south of Tennessee
River; Atlanta Subdivision, including Atlanta Terminals and Atlanta
Connection; Chattanooga Subdivision; Montgomery and New Orleans
Subdivision; Pensacola Subdivision."
When the claimants were laid off, they protected their seniority by
filing their respective addresses with the proper Carrier officer in accordance with the provisions set forth within Rule 21 (G) reading:
Copy of the claim and correspondence exchanged in connection therewith
is attached and identified as Carrier's Exhibits "A" through "I".
There is on file with the Third Division a copy of the current working
rules agreement, and it, by reference, is made a part of this submission.
(Exhibits not Reproduced)
OPINION OF BOARD: The claim herein is in behalf of furloughed
employes of the Carrier's Knoxville and Atlanta Division because a Bridge
and Building gang from Carrier's Cumberland Valley Division was used
to perform work on the Knoxville and Atlanta Division.
The record shows that as a result of a derailment the Carrier's main
line was blocked and the decking of a bridge damaged near LaFollette,
Tennessee, on the Knoxville and Atlanta Division. A Knoxville and Atlanta
Division Bridge and Building gang was called. It developed that additional
men were needed and the Carrier called an intact Bridge and Building gang
from the adjoining Cumberland Valley Division. The Petitioner says
that the Cumberland Valley Division gang was used to relieve the Knoxville
and Atlanta Division gang at 7:00 A.M. on May 19, 1968, the Knoxville and
Atlanta Division gang having worked throughout the night of May 18.
We agree that the derailment and damage to the decking of the bridge
resulted in an emergency. In the emergency situation the Carrier, in addition
to calling a gang from the Knoxville and Atlanta Division, called a gang
from another district that was intact. We have held that in an emergency
the Carrier should be permitted to exercise latitude in meeting the situation.
There is nothing in the record to indicate that Carrier's purpose in the use
of employes of another seniority district was to evade the application of
the seniority principle or to circumvent the Agreement.
For the reasons given we hold that the Agreement was not violated.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
AWARD
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of March 1970.
Central Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 46206 Printed in U.S.A.
17795 4