_- Award Number 17830








PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Transportation-Communication Employees Union on the Louisiana and Arkansas Railway, that:




EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS:



An Agreement between the parties, effective January 1, 1956, as amended and supplemented, is available to your Board and by this reference is made a part hereof.


This claim was timely presented, progressed in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement, including conference with the highest officer designated by the Carrier to receive appeals, and has been declined. The Employees, therefore, appeal to your Honorable Board for adjudication.


This claim arose when Carrier assigned a telegrapher in the employ of the Kansas City Southern Railway to fill a one day vacancy in a position assigned to telegraphers employed by the Louisiana and Arkansas Railway in Deramus Yard, Shreveport, Louisiana.







By a Coordination Agreement finalized on December 7, 1955, the telegraphers' positions on the KCS and L&A Railways in Shreveport, Louisiana were allocated on the basis of the total number of positions in effect on both Carriers at that time. Certain positions were allocated to KCS em-

"Extra and vacation relief work (including temporary positions and temporary vacancies contemplated in Rule 4-5) on positions allotted to KCS employees shall be performed by KCS employees; and extra and vacation relief work (including temporary positions and temporary vacancies contemplated in Rule 4-5) on positions allotted to L&A employees shall be performed by L&A employees. If such work is not protected through the operation of Rule 4-5, and there are no regularly assigned or extra employees available on the carrier involved, employees of the other carrier (an available extra man who has not had five days' work within his work week, or an available employee regularly assigned at Shreveport, in that order), may be used to meet the emergency until employees of the first carrier can be made available; while being so used such employees will be paid in accordance with the applicable rules, and while working for the other carrier they will not acquire seniority thereon but will retain and accumulate seniority on their respective home carrier."


For some time prior to claim, there had been a vacancy on the 11:59 PM Telegrapher position at Shreveport, because of the regular incumbent (Welch) working as dispatcher. The 11:59 PM job is a 7-day position filled Wednesday through Sunday by Welch, an L&A employee, and on Monday and Tuesday by a regular relief employee - a KCS employee. On Tuesday, September 19, 1967, the 11:59 P.M. position was filled by the regular assigned relief employee (Protho, a KCS employee) and on claim date, Wednesday, September 20, 1967, in the absence of an available, regular or extra L&A employee, it was again filled by Protho, the only available telegrapher at Shreveport. (Protho's rest days were Wednesday and Thursday.)


Claimant was regularly assigned as telegrapher at Alexandria, La., located 129 miles south of Shreveport. Two-shift telegrapher service is maintained daily at Alexandria, the first shift 8:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., the second shift 10:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M. During the month of September, 1967, there was a shortage of telegraphers at Alexandria, brought about by the retirement of the first-trick operator and an at-home injury to the second-trick operator, with the result that it was necessary to work claimant 19 consecutive days during the period September 1 through September 19, 1967, and he was not available for service at Shreveport on claim date.




OPINION OF BOARD: The claim herein arose in connection with the filling of a third-shift telegrapher position in coordinated facilities in Deramus Yard, Shreveport, Louisiana, on September 20, 1967.




reads:


17830 12

man who has not had five days' work within his work week, or an available employee regularly assigned at Shreveport, in that order), may be used to meet the emergency until employees of the first carrier can be made available; while being so used such employees will be paid in accordance with the applicable rules, and while working for the other carrier they will not acquire seniority thereon but will retain and accumulate seniority on their respective home carrier."


The Petitioner contends that the Agreement was violated when the Carrier assigned a telegrapher in the employ of the Kansas City Southern Railway to fill a one-day vacancy in a position assigned to telegraphers employed by the Louisiana and Arkansas Railway in the coordinated facility. The Carrier contends that Article 5(c) of the Coordination Agreement does not contemplate that Louisiana and Arkansas Railway employes at locations other than Shreveport should be given preference to L&A vacancies at Shreveport; that it has always been the practice to use Shreveport employes on Shreveport vacancies; that Claimant, who was regularly assigned as telegrapher at Alexandria, La., some 129 miles from Shreveport, was not available, and that he suffered no deprivation of earnings.


It is well settled that this Board must apply agreements as written. We do not find in Article 5(e) of the Coordination Agreement of December 7, 1955, any provision restricing the rights of L&A employes at locations other than Shreveport to L&A vacancies at Shreveport, as contended by the Carrier. Further, the record contains no evidence to support the practice alleged by the Carrier. We likewise find no evidence to support the contention that Claimant was not available. Article 5(c) of the Coordination Agreement of December 7, 1955, was violated and the claim will be sustained.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and














Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 24th day of April 1970.

Central Publishing Co., Indianapolis, Ind. 46206 Printed in U.S.A.

17830 13