^'- aaa Award No. 17983
Docket No. TE-17837
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION
Arthur W. Devine,
Referee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC
RAILROAD COMPANY
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the
Transportation-Communication Employees Union or. the Chicago, Rock Island
and Pacific Railroad, that:
CASE NO. 1
1. The Carrier violates the provisions of the Agreement between
the parties hereto when on August 15 to September 2, 1966, inclusive, it permitted Ruth N. Blair, a telephone operator at Rock
Island, Illinois, a position within the scope of the Clerks' Agreement,
to perform printer operator's work for eight hours daily in its Rock
Island Relay Office.
2. Carrier shall now be required to pay the senior idle regular
assigned printer operator in its Relay Division, a day's pay of
eight hours for each day of violation.
CASE NO. 2
1. The Carrier violates the provisions of the Agreement between
the parties hereto when on July 22 to August 19, 1966, inclusive,
it permitted C. J. Joule, a clerk at El Reno, Oklahoma, a position
within the scope of the Clerks' Agreement, to perform printer operator's work for eight hours daily in its El Reno Relay Office.
2. Carrier shall now be required to pay D. H. Baker a day's
pay of eight hours time and one-half rate for eighteen days, July 22
to August 19.
EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS:
STATED%fENT Ol? THE CASE
The two disputes in this submission arose when the Carrier used employes who held seniority under the Brotherhood of Railway Clerks to
perform work on vacation vacancies at Rock Island Relay Office and at E1 Reno
5.
To avoid burdening the record, Carrier has not included copies of
the correspondence presented on the property concerning this claim, as it is
anticipated the Brotherhood will produce such correspondence as a part of
its submission. However, Carrier will refer to various portions of this
correspondence, as necessary, and will reproduce pertinent portions of same
where appropriate. Carrier will also take exception in its rebuttal statement
to any errors or omissions in the Brotherhood's reproduction of such correspondence.
6. This Carrier would further point out that on the property the Organization did on December 8, 1967, request the Carrier to hold the claim identified as Case No. 2 in this dispute in abeyance "to be guided by the principle that may be established in the case covered by" the claim identified as
Case No. 1 in this dispute. In this connection, on February 2, 1968 Carrier
advised General Chairman M. F. Van Corp of the Organization as follows:
"We are agreeable to holding the instant claim in abeyance to
be disposed of on the basis of the principle established by the Third
Division of the National Railroad Adjustment Board in the claims
of Printer Operators J. L. DeLozier, K. L. Hammond and M. A. Reed
for various amounts during the period August 15
through September
2, 1966, account Ruth M. Blair used as a vacation relief printer at
Rock Island, Illinois, covered by your file 145-323, Carrier's file
L-123-1201."
OPINION Oh' BOARD:
This dispute involves two separate claims:
Case No. 1 alleges improper use of a telephone operator, subject to the
terms of the Clerks' Agreement, to perform vacation relief work on a printer
operator position covered by the Telegraphers' Agreement.
Resolution of the issue posed by this dispute would require a determination of the status of the relief employe at the time she performed the
vacation relief work. The record is inadequate for such a determination
because the parties' assertions are in conflict. The Board has no means of
resolving such conflict; and, since the burden of establishing grounds for
complaint rests with the petitioner, and has not been met here, the claim
must be denied.
Case No. 2 alleges improper use of a clerk to fill a temporary vacancy
in a printer operator position while its incumbent was absent due to illness.
Here again the parties are in conflict concerning the status of the employs alleged to have been improperly used. However, Carrier's assertion, in
its ex parts submission, that this employe was in fact an extra employe
under the Telegraphers' Agreement, and did not become an employe under
the Clerks' Agreement until after the printer operator vacancy terminated,
was not denied by the Employes.
Under these circumstances, this claim also must be denied.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the
whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
17983 21
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
AWARD
Claims denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of THIRD DIVISION
ATTEST: S. H. Schulty
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of June 1970.
Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
17983 22