^'- aaa Award No. 17983
Docket No. TE-17837







PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

TRANSPORTATION-COMMUNICATION EMPLOYEES UNION

CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC

RAILROAD COMPANY


STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Transportation-Communication Employees Union or. the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad, that:













The two disputes in this submission arose when the Carrier used employes who held seniority under the Brotherhood of Railway Clerks to perform work on vacation vacancies at Rock Island Relay Office and at E1 Reno

5. To avoid burdening the record, Carrier has not included copies of the correspondence presented on the property concerning this claim, as it is anticipated the Brotherhood will produce such correspondence as a part of its submission. However, Carrier will refer to various portions of this correspondence, as necessary, and will reproduce pertinent portions of same where appropriate. Carrier will also take exception in its rebuttal statement to any errors or omissions in the Brotherhood's reproduction of such correspondence.


6. This Carrier would further point out that on the property the Organization did on December 8, 1967, request the Carrier to hold the claim identified as Case No. 2 in this dispute in abeyance "to be guided by the principle that may be established in the case covered by" the claim identified as Case No. 1 in this dispute. In this connection, on February 2, 1968 Carrier advised General Chairman M. F. Van Corp of the Organization as follows:





Case No. 1 alleges improper use of a telephone operator, subject to the terms of the Clerks' Agreement, to perform vacation relief work on a printer operator position covered by the Telegraphers' Agreement.


Resolution of the issue posed by this dispute would require a determination of the status of the relief employe at the time she performed the vacation relief work. The record is inadequate for such a determination because the parties' assertions are in conflict. The Board has no means of resolving such conflict; and, since the burden of establishing grounds for complaint rests with the petitioner, and has not been met here, the claim must be denied.


Case No. 2 alleges improper use of a clerk to fill a temporary vacancy in a printer operator position while its incumbent was absent due to illness.


Here again the parties are in conflict concerning the status of the employs alleged to have been improperly used. However, Carrier's assertion, in its ex parts submission, that this employe was in fact an extra employe under the Telegraphers' Agreement, and did not become an employe under the Clerks' Agreement until after the printer operator vacancy terminated, was not denied by the Employes.




FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




17983 21
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and











Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of June 1970.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
17983 22