®ese Award No. 18320
Docket No. MW-18708







BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES
CHICAGO & EASTERN ILLINOIS RAILROAD COMPANY

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The five (5) day suspension imposed upon Section Foreman J. G. Fletcher and Section Laborers J. F. Akers and S. S. Baird was improper and without just and sufficient cause.



OPINION OF BOARD: On November 22, 1968, Claimants and other members of a section crew were traveling north from Westville on a motor car identified as M-755. At approximately 8:50 A. M. the car was approaching a public crossing located at MP 129, pole 36. The foreman disengaged the drive belt of the car and prepared to stop. Not being in a position to observe the crossings for track obstructions, he relied upon signal from occupants of the car in forward positions. Receiving signal to proceed, he engaged the belt and proceeded to move over the crossing. The car was derailed when it struck an object lodged in the crossing flangeway.


The occupants of the car-Claimants and two other crew memberswere served with the following notice under date of November 27, 1968:


"Formal investigation will be held in the Trainmaster's Office, Danville, Illinois, 9:00 A. M., December 10, 1968, to determine facts and place responsibility, if any, in connection with derailment of motor car M-755 assigned to you which occurred at 8:50 A. M., November 22nd, 1968, at public crossing MP 129 P 36 on the Westville Subdivision. (Emphasis ours.)


You may have a representative of your choice and any witness you desire in line with current MofW Agreement"








The transcript of the bearing is barren of any substantial evidence of probative value to support Carrier's findings: (1) "account your violation of certain MofW Rules;" (2) the car did in fact strike a rock on the public crossing. This being a discipline case, Carrier bore the burden of proof. Carrier's findings appears to be predicated on an assumption that because there was a derailment it must conclusively be presumed that it was caused by nonfeasance or misfeasance of one or more of the occupants of the car. Such is sophistry, not substantial evidence of negligence. We, therefore, will sustain the Claim.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:



That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and











Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 4th day of December 1970.

Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, Ill. Printed in U.S.A.
18320 2