111W3e9 Award No. 18450
Docket No. TD-18717






PARTIES TO DISPUTE:



STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the American Train Dispatchers Association that:

(a) The St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company (hereinafter "the Carrier") violated the effective Agreement between the parties, Article 1 thereof in particular, whet on January 16, 1969, it required and/or permitted an employe not within the scope of the Agreement to perform work covered thereby.





EMPLOYES' STATEMENT OF FACTS: There is an Agreement in effect between the parties, copy of which is on file with this Board, and the same is incorporated into this Ex Parte Submission as though fully set out herein.

For the Board's ready reference Article I of said Agreement is here quoted in full:





This agreement shall govern the hours of service and working conditions of train dispatchers. The term `train dispatcher' as hereinafter used, shall include night chief, assistant chief, trick, relief and extra train dispatchers. It is agreed that one chief dispatcher in each dispatching office shall be excepted from the scope and provision of this agreement.

permit her to accompany- her husband to an Oklahoma City hospital for surgery.


OPINION OF BOARD: This dispute involves the same parties, issues and Agreement as in Award No. 18448. For reasons stated in that Award the Claim is denied.


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:




That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;


That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and








Dated at Chicago, Illinois. this 19th day of March 1971.

LABOR MEMBERS' DISSENT 7'O

AWARDS 18448, 18449, 18450, 18451

DOCKETS TD-18719, TD-18716, TD-18717, TD-18718







The transmission of messages was not the issue of the disputes. The employes never took that position. The issue was persons not within the scope of the agreement performing work covered therein. The work in question was the decision involving the supervision of employes, not transmittal of messages after the decision was made.






Keenan Printing Co., Chicago, 111. Printed In U.S.A.
18450 4