BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC.
(Formerly Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company)
(1) The Carrier violated the Agreement when it reduced the meal allowance of B&B Gang #2 of the Ottumwa Division from three (3) to two (2) dollars per day for the period extending from January 30 through February 25, 1969. (System File 24-3/M-1327-69).
(2) B&B Foreman Atha, B&B Mechanics R. W. Ambelang, L. F. Ambelang, J. Giza and B&B Helpers E. Williams and B. M. Barker each be allowed an additional ore (1) dollar for each day within the period extending from January 30 through February 25, 1969 because of the violation referred to within Part (1) of this claim.
The company shall provide for employes who are employed in a type of service, the nature of which regularly requires them throughout their work week to live away from home in outfit cars, camps, highway trailers, hotels or motels as follows:
Claim was timely and properly presented and handled by the Employes at all stages of appeal up to and including the Carrier's highest appellate officer.
The Agreement in effect between the two parties to this dispute dated September 1, 1949, together with supplements, amendments and interpretations thereto is by reference made a part of this Statement of Facts.
CARRIER'S STATEMENT OF FACTS: The claimants named in the Statement of Claim were members of Ottumwa Division B&B Gang No. 2. Kitchen car 209185 was assigned to this gang during the period of the claim, beginning January 30, 1969. The car was equipped with stove, refrigerator, utensils, dishes and cutlery.
The claimant employes were paid a sneal allowance of $2.00 per day in accordance with Rule 59(e) of the agreement between the parties entered into on February 21, 1968 pursuant to the provisions of Arbitration Award 298 dealing with expenses away from home. Claim is made herein that the cooking and eating facilities provided by the Carrier did not meet the standards set forth in Rule 59(h), and that the claimants were therefore entitled to the $3.00 per day allowance stipulated in Rule 59(f).
Rule 59 just referred to, and other rules not pertinent to this particular dispute, are included in a Memorandum of Understanding entered into by the parties to this dispute on February 21, 1968 pursuant to the option of the Employes to elect to adopt Sections I and II of Arbitration Award 298. A copy of this Memorandum of Understanding is attached hereto as Carrier's Exhibit No. 1.
OPINION OF BOARD: The facts involved in this case encompass essentially the same facts as contained in Award No. 18577. Therefore, for the same reasons as outlined in Award No. 18577, this claim will be dismissed.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds: