(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Union Railroad Company



(a) Carrier violated the current Signalmen's Agreement, as amended, particularly Rule 1 (Scope), when during September and October, 1966, it used employes not covered by the Agreement to perform Signal Work consisting of the installation of seventy-six (76) insulated rail joints at the scales being built at Clairton.

(b) Leading Signalmen William F. Freidhof and Robert J. Hayes each be paid sixty-four (64) hours at the straight-time rate ($2.9788) and thirty-two (32) hours at the time and one-half rate ($4.4682) as a result.



OPINION OF BOARD: This dispute concerns the Signalmen's contention that the
work of installing certain rail joints is reserved to them
by their Agreement with the Carrier. It is contended by the Employes that the
rail joints in question are insulated joints of the type used in railroad sig
naling. The Carrier counters in its ex parte submission that the joints were
installed after being modified by omitting the insulating "end post". The Car
rier's defense is not challenged.







That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and



        That the Agreement was not violated.


                    A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                          NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                          By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day of May 1972.

' .~, X: ~;2~:'..I