(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claims of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of Railroad

(a) The Southern Pacific Company violated the current Signalmen's Agreement (effective April 1, it failed and/or declined to apply the Scope Rule, which resulted in the violation of Rule 70, in assigning recognized signal work to emplbyes-not covered by the Signalmen's Agreement at the signal system on the engine washing facility at Eugene Yard, Oregon, on or about March 10, 1965.

 (b) Messrs. W. Barber and A. J. Trojan be allowed eight (8) hours at their respective time and one-half overtime rates of pay for a date which the Carrier's records will
(c) Messrs. Barber and Trojan be allowed one (1) hour each at their respective time and one-half overtime rates of pay for each week that the Carrier continues to violate the agreement by assigning other than signal forces to the maintenance of this signal system.

OPINION OF BOARD: The washing machinery and apparatus is not part of the signal
 system, and from the record, does not belong to the signalmen under the scope rule.

 FINDINGS; The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
 to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
 record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

 That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

 That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and



        That the Agreement was not violated,


                      A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                            NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJl:5-MH;Nt _. ,_..

                            By qrder of ThiXU Division


ATTEST: _
        E'ceeutive Secretary


Ilah(--d ;IL I.liio;te.o, i 11 Ln,l.:a lni5 ~ytt 'aY )F SfptplpOa! 1972,