NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-19312
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(J. F. Nash and R. C. Haldeman, Trustees of the Property
( of Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Debtor
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (CL-6939)
that:
(a) Carrier violated the Agreement between the parties effective Mav
1, 1955, as revised when it refused to fill a vacancy at Tifft Terminal, Buffalo.
N.1., 11:59 P.M. on August 5, 1969, and permitted Assistant Trainmaster C. A.
Dahn, to cut cards, run and operate Flexon Writer Machine and booked Train L.V.
(b) Claim is submitted for a days pay at punitive rate for D. Bennett,
Clerk, for August 5, 1969, due to this violation.
OPINION OF BOARD: This is the fourth dispute involving the same issue between
the same Petitioner and Respondent which this Board has con
sidered in recent months, wherein Respondent's first defense is that the Organ
ization did not comply with the provisions of Rule 33 - Time Limits (adopted
from the National Agreement of August 21, 1954) in that the Employes failed to
progress the controversy to the Board within nine (9) months from the date of
decision by Carrier's highest designated officer to handle claims and grievances,
said letter dated April 13, 1970. The Organization's letter giving Notice of
lrntent to file an ex parte submission with this Division was dated January 19,
1971. The Organization is only six (6) days out of time but, nonetheless, out
of time.
In this dispute, as in the three previous claims (Awards 19021, 19096
and 19164) the Organization argues that a waiver existed on time limits in which
to file claims with this Board. The first time (Award 19021) we carefully considered the Organizatio
and 19164) we considered additional evidence submitted in support of the argument.
In the instant case, we have again reviewed the entire record of handling dispute:
on the property.
What we stated in Award 19021 continues to hold:
"Notwithstanding the arguments of the Organization which we
carefully considered, we firmly believe that the Carrier gave no
unqualified waiver of the nine month time limit for appealing
claims to the division."
In view of the above, we conclude that the claim was not timely filed
with the Board and must be dismissed.
Award Number 19505 Page 2
Docket Number CL-19312
FINDING;: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectiv·cly Carrier .tnd Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor A.~
as
aporoved June 21, 1934;
That this D;.vi--ion of the Adjustment Board has jurisdicticn over
t-lie dis;,u;~· iuvol~·cd herein; and
That
~.lIe
claim be dismissed in accordance with the Opinion,
A II A R D
Claim is dismissed, in accordance with the Opinion and Findinso
NATIONAL R1lY,COAD ADJUSTMENT ROAPD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
~~
a -p~!~./
Execnt,.·c So( relary
Dated at Chicago. Illinois, this 30th day of November 1972.
I