(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES TO DISPUTE:

.~TATEMEN'T OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood n: R.1i ;,

(.:) The Southern Pacific Cn~pany violated the current. Sipnal;;rll:': -anent effective April 1, 1947 (reprinted April 1, 1955, includin;; tevisinns, ..._. railed and/or declined to apply the Scope Pule, which resulted in viol:,tiOn ;:. 7i), by assigning the recognized signal work of installing switch heaters to o r.! nut covered by the `;i_.;nalmen's Agreement, on power switches at Bclack Butte, tint:. Andcsite, Grass Lake, Pennoyer, Kegg, Mt. Hebron, and Dorris, California.

 (b) Messrs. L. W. DeMoll, Signal Foreman; W. R. Anderson, L,e;~di:_
 nal.an; C. G. dowdy and J. L. Brown, Signalmen, be allowed ni~5t (8) hours.- .
 respective rates of pay for the following dates; October il, 12, 13, 14, I~,
 ?0, 21, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, and 29, 1965.

 (c) Messrs. W. R. Anderson, Signal Foreman; C. C. Mowdy, I.tiadin,; .'
 %in; 1. L. Brown and R, Conrad, Signalmen, be allowed eight (8) hours at the,-- -
 :-ps·ctive rates of pay for the following dates: November 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, h, '!,
 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19, 1965.
nalman; C. G. Mowdy and J.L. Brown, Signalmen, be allowed eight (8) hours .:t ^!
 r( spective rates of pay for the following dates: Novcmber 22, 23, 24 and ;'G, 7"'
 ,Carrier's File: SIG 152-190)
 CPCNION OF BOARD: The dispute arose when Carrier assigned other titan sLCnal
 employees to install electric switch heaters at various loc;tions in California between October
The parties, the issues and the applicable Hides .i. idonticsl :-7,
 present in Award 19506, and for the reasons stated therein the claim crilt
 be de^1f·.d.

 While Petitioner argued before the Tioard Chat "Lt was nece~sarv to rc-"o·:·;: ·'.;e rail braces from the gauge plates, and the _r~il_cr Lrnm t`:c stock rails", the Statement of Claim is lLinitE·d Lo the work .~f iiist,lli-.Lhese Switch heaters, hence there is no is3,rc before us concerniw&middo :ril br_es ur roLler hangers.
          Award Number 19507 Page 2

                Docket Number SG-16877


FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the
 parties to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

 That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

 That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over rhc dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agrecm:nt was not violated.


                      A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                        NATIONAL RAILrOAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                        By Order of- Third Division


ATTEST:
        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of November 1972.