(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen PARTIES I') DISPUTE:

S_CATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Curtmittee of the Brotherhood of railroad

la) The Southern Pacific Company -,violated the current 3ignalmen's Agre·.:.icnt :· filed and/or declined to apply the Scope :7ulc,.ohich resulted in violation of ~t~le 7(1, by assigning the recognized signal wore. of `nstalling switch r,eaters to sw:t-_I:,·, at each .-nd )f the Siskiyou, Oregon, siding to emoi~:v,~ nor ~~worc·d by the Signal~nen's Ag
(b) Signal Foreman R. A, Fraga; Signalmen L, P, Brockman, I), W, McIntyre, and C. W, Hampton; and Assistant Signalman D. R. Thomas - Shasta Division Sic,n.21 i.au=, No, 25 - i,o allowed eight (8) hours each f,,r each of the Collowing dates: Januar:: 31, February 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 21, 23, 14, and 25, 1966, at their resnecrive rates of pay, (Carrier's File. SIG 152-196)

 OPINION OF BOARD: The dispute arose when Carrier assigned other than signpl em-
 ployes to install switch heaters at Siskiyou, Oregon between January 31, 1965 and February 25, 1966,

 The parties, the issues and the applicable Rules are identical to those present in Award 19509, and for the reasons stated therein tile claim will bc: denied.

 FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
 to this dispute due notice o_ hearing thereon, and upon the whole
 record and all the evidence, finds and holds:

 That the Carrier and the Enpl,)yes inv,)lv.d in t:l·is o - note are respectively Carrier and Imployes within the:-;anine~i tlll. k. wa. f,abor A, -t, as approved June 21, 1934;

 That this Division of the A.'djustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved hereiq; and

j

                    A W A R D


        Claim denied.


                              NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                              By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: ~~· i~4,[
 Executive Secretary

 Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of November 1972.