NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number MW-19821
Frederick R. Blackwell, Referee
(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes
^'0
PARTIES TO DISPUTE
(Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company
Statement of Claim : Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:
(1) Track Re?nirnan Michael L. Young was unjustly dismissed from
`nr~ice (by 1'~ttrc dated October 11, 1971) for allegedly "walking off the job
-9-c~:..~ Octob^r R, 7.971" (System File 1-12/D-103798E-30618).
(2) Track Repairman Michael L. Young be reinstated with all rights
unimpaired and that he be compensated for all wage loss suffered all in accorde^-ce with Rule 27(f).
n~T~"r,T
OF'. f~'.T;7: This is a discipline case arising under Agreement between
the parties effective May 1, 1960. The claimant was dis
-i~cr0 for nlle~edly "wal :i ng off the job on Friday, October 3, 1^71."
There is considerable discussion in the record as to whether claimant
was uismisccd by his fore-nn or by the Division Engineer, but eye do not consider
r1-^_
issue i.-.,ortant. The fact remains that claimant was terminated. In passing,
1·.c--c·,·cr, it would appear that if the Division Engineer actually dicmisocd
tL=n he (tie Division Engineer) would have notified the clainant to that
effect:.
We
have
reviewed the entire record, including the transcript of the
investigation conducted en October 25, 1971. It appears that claimant may have
h.~d a lc7it`n=to r_;;cuse for going home shortly after noon cn October 8, 1971,
tint is, th,2 illness of his daughter and the matter of trking her to see a
-. Kovc·rer, he should have reported to the foremen before actually leaving
'~'1· n
n -n..
While the clairant had short service with the Carrier, and that service
ray rot have been entirely satisfactory, at the same tine permanent dismissal
under the :ircimotances ,.s developed in the record, was excessive. We
drill
award
t'·at cloi-.ant be restores to service with seniority and other rights unimpaired,
btit withcAt rag. for time lost o:hile out of service.
h::ard Number 19569 Page 2
r:,~':c';: J:uster MW-19821
F'M7~I7"%.^.: Thn
r:::rd
~i~:,:ic-?. of the !.djv.;t-_^nt Pcard, upon ;..he whole record
and n11 :.he rrv' -.tec, find.^. and holds:
That the rarA,icf^, ,-ivcd oral hcarin;
T!:_^.t the Cerri.c^ -rd the r~loyes involved in this dispute are
ren, cc's=·.·My Ca-r;.er end ~'.~_~lnycs within the rsaning of the Railtay Labo
-.-,..~.-c,l .T: . _ 21, 1^~ : ;
innt this Dir3sion of the l,djust=r2t Board bas jurisdiction over the
c?isr·,_A.c involr;.;?ierein; ^n:t
That the discipline imposed was excessive.
n
e7
r. a
D
Claim sustained to the extent indicated in Opinion and Findings.
YATZCNU. E.I=C:4nr:~,;sT::
-z r.:_^sm
By Order of ::gird. Di ai.ca
D-tcd ,et Chic^Zo, Illi.::c:.:,
":;,t
; 30th day o° Ja.-uiary 1973.