NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number TE-19434
Frederick R. Blackwell, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
(Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employee
((Formerly Transportation-Communication Division, BRAC)
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Transportation
Communication Division, BRAC, on the Missouri-Kansas
Texas Railroad Company, T-C 5813, that:
1. Carrier violated the provisions of the Telegraphers' Agreement
by failing to properly compensate Telegrapher-Leverman T. W. Brown and W. H.
Gooch, South Tower, Muskogee, Oklahoma, for their birthday-holidays, i.e.,
March 19th, 1970 and April 5th, 1970, respectively, which fell on an assigned
work day of their respective work weeks during their granted vacation period.
2. Carrier shall now compensate claimants Brown and Gooch in the
amount of $14.08 each, which is the existing shortage and difference between
the amount claimed (eight hours pro-rata rate and eight hours punitive rate)
and the amount allowed (eight hours pro-rata "vacation pay" and eight hours
pro-rata (birthday-holiday pay").
OPINION OF BOARD: This dispute arises under Agreement between the parties
dated September 1, 1949, as amended and supplemented.
While on vacation claimants' birthdays fell on assigned work days
of their respective work weeks and their positions were worked on such days.
They were paid eight hours pro rata for their birthday-holiday and eight
hours pro rata for their vacation days. Petitioner contends claimants are
entitled to time and one-half for the vacation days under Article 7(a),
December 17, 1941 Vacation Agreement and Interpretation dated June 10, 1942.
Carrier contends its method of payment conformed with the combined
text of the National Agreement dated December 28, 1.967 (Art. III, Sec. 3 (b))
and the Agreement dated November 20, 1964 (Art. II, Sec. 6 (a)), and with
its policy of blanking on birthday holidays. An August 14, 1970 letter of
Carrier's Personnel Manager makes referer_ce to the text in Sec. 6 (a) of the
1964 Agreement which states that "if an employee's birthday falls on other
than a work day of the workweek of the individual employee, he shall receive
eight hours' pay at the pro-rata rate of the position to which assigned, in
addition to any other pay to which he is otherwise entitled for that day,
if any." The letter then states that the birtt:dajs "fell on other than a
work day, i. e., a vacation day, and they were allowed eight hours' pay at
xz_::. :;..,;~
Award Number 19617 Page 2
Docket Number TE-19434
pro rata for their 'birthday holiday', and eight hours' pay at the pro rata
rate for their vacation pay." The rulings in Awards 15722 (Miller) and 15910
(McGovern) are contrary to the contention in the letter and we believe these
Awards are diapositive of this aspect of the matter.
With respect to whether the positions had to be blanked in order
to justify Carrier's method of payment, or whether, as Carrier contends a
policy of blanking is sufficient justification, it appears that prior Awards
have both rejected and sustained Carrier's position. In the circumstances
of this particular case we believe Award 17200 (Meyer) is in general accord
with Carrier's position and we shall dismiss the claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employer involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employer within the meaning of the Railway Labor
Act, as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A WAR 0
Claim dismissed.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 27th day of February 1973.