NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-19541
Robert M, O'Brien, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline & Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes
(Missouri Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-7011)
that:
1. Carrier violated the Clerks' Agreement when it required Clerk
Mrs. T. L. Mohler to work position of Rate Clerk (138), April 24, 1970, Freeport, Texas, and then re
(a-1) of the Clerks' Rules Agreement,
2. Carrier shall now be required to compensate Mrs. T. L, Mohler
for an additional five (5) hours at the rate of time and one-half for work performed April 24, 1970.
OPINION OF BOARD: The facts giving rise to the instant claim are not in dis
pute. On Friday, April 24, 1970, Mrs. L. LeCompEe was
unable to work her regular assignment account of illness so she laid off sick.
She is regularly assigned to position of Rate Clerk, No. 138, hours of assign
ment 1:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. Claimant is regularly assigned to position of
Rate Clerk, No. 119, hours of assignment 9:00 A.M. to 6:00 P.M. Upon completing
her regular assignment claimant performed the work of position No. 138, working
such position until 10:15 P.M., for which she was paid 4 hours, 15 minutes at
The Organization maintains that claimant was required to fill Rate
Clerk position No. 138 in the absence of the incumbent thereof, and should be
paid according to Rule 37(a-1) which entitles her to a full 8 hours pay at overtime rate though she
merely performed overtime service continuous with her assignment for which she
was properly paid on the minute basis at the overtime rate in compliance with
Rule 37 (c-1),
It is undisputed that Carrier has the right to blank a position in
the absence of the regularly assigned incumbent where there is no contractual
restriction against such blanking. However, a position is blanked when no one
works it and here claimant worked position No. 138 and thus we conclude that it
was, in fact, filled, not blanked as Carrier contends. Carrier concedes this in
their letter of June 16, 1970 when Supt, Blassingame wrote: "...Clerk Mohler
...
was used on an overtime basis from
6
PM until 10:15 P.M. on Rate Clerk position
which was vacant because of illness of Mrs. L, LeCompte _ .." and in their letter
?KA:
awl
Award Number 19668 Page 2
Docket Number CL-19541
of July 21, 1971 when Mr. 0. B. Sayers wrote: "She was held on overtime to
perform work which normally would have been performed by the occupant of rate
clerk Job No. 138...." He went on to state that the position was not filled
however.
Since Carrier elected to fill the position by utilizing claimant
therein, it was bound to pay her 8 hours pay for the assignment in compliance
with Rule 37 (a-1).
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and
all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21, 1934;
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was violated.
A W A R D
Claim sustained.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: ~~,~/
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 23rd day of March 1973.
~..w~,~