(Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employee PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (The Illinois Central Railroad Company

STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood that:

(1) The harrier violated the Agreement when it arbitrarily required a group of employ·~s at the Centralia Pressure Welding Plant to take two (2) weeks of vacation o,:gianing January 2, 1970 (System File SLN-109-W-70/Case No, 724 MofW).

(2) In addition to tn,, pay they have received, each of the claimants* be paid at their respective time and one-half rates for the days indicated opposite their names beca














OPINION OF BOARD: Claimants are assigned to Carrier's Centralia Pressure Weld
ing Plant at Centralia, Illinois. Carrier was converting
the operations of this plant from one shift operation to a two shift operation.
During the transitional period, Carrier alleges that it was impossible to con
tinue normal operations at the plant and Claimants were instructed to take two
and/or three weeks of their vacation, commencing January 2, 1970. Claimants
protested Carrier's instructions as being in violation of Article 4 of the Vaca
tion Agreement.







. "The local committee of each organization signatory

        hereto and the representatives of the Carrier will cooperate

        in assigning vacation dates,


        (b) The Management may upon reasonable notice (of thirty (30) days or more, if possible, but in no event less than fifteen (15) days) require all or any number of employes it. any plant, operation, or facility, who are entitled to vacations to take vacations at the same t


        The local committee of each organization affected signatory hereto and the proper representative cooperate in the assignment of remaining forces."


The primary issue to be determined is whether adequate notice was given to the Claimants requiring all or any number of them to take their vacations at the same time. of operation necessitating shutting down the plant operations during the transition period and all w not made known to them until the week-end of December 26, 1969.

It is the opinion of the Board, giving full consideration to facts and rules at hand, that Carrier did not give adequate notice in accordance with Article 4 of the Vacatio
The claims will be allowed. Since Claimants have already been paid at straight time for each day claimed, they each shall receive one-half time additional pay for the num
        FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record and all the evidence, finds and holds:


        That the parties waived oral hearing;


That the Carrier and the Employes involved in this dispute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934;

That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and

        That the Agreement was violated.

          Award Number 19714 Page 3

                    Docket Number MW-19672

                    A W A R D


        Claim sustained to extent set forth in the Opinion.


                            NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD

                            By Order of Third Division


ATTEST:
        Executive Secretary


Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 13th day of April 1973,.

;~,~.>~