NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number SG-17877
C, Robert Roadley, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(Southern Pacific Company (Pacific Lines)
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the General Committee of the Brotherhood of Railroad
Signalmen on the Southern Pacific Company that:
(a) The Southern Pacific Company violated the current Signalmen's
Agreement, effective April 1, 1947 and reprinted April 1, 1958, (including
revisions), when it failed and/or declined to apply the Scope Rule which resulted
in the violation of Rule 70, when it assigns the work of maintaining, inspecting,
testing and repairing part of the hot box detector systems located west of Tucumcari, New Mexico to
our Agreement.
(b) That Mr. E. F. Yandell be allowed an equivalent amount of time as
that used by employee who are not covered by the Signalmen's Agreement in performing the assigned wo
(c) That this claim continue, and apply to any employee succeeding the
claimant in paragraph (b) above, on assignment of Signal Maintainer at Tucumcari,
New Mexico, until the violation mentioned in paragraph (a) above ceases. (Carrier's File: SIG 152-22
OPINION OF BOARD: The work involved in this dispute is identical to that in
volved in Award No. 14279. The dispute resolved by Award
No. 14279 was governed by the parties' Scope Rule in their 1947 Agreement. That
Rule was revised in 1963, but insofar as the present work is concerned, we note
no specific language to overturn Award No. 14279, neither do we find that award
to be palpable error.
We must therefore deny this claim.
FINDINGS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, after giving the parties
to this dispute due notice of hearing thereon, and upon the whole
record and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and Employee within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved .June 21, 1934;
I
, =~ ·~.:~
Award Number 19729 Page 2
Docket Number SG-17877
That this Division of the Adjustment Board has jurisdiction over
the dispute involved herein; and
That the Agreement was not violated.
A W A R D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST:
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 30th day of April 1973.
ii .r
jr;.'t~