(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks, ( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employee PARTIES TO DISPUTE: (The Western Pacific Railroad Company



1, The Carrier violated the rules of the Agreement extant between the parties when it dismissed Miss L, Creelman from service of the Co.oany,

2. Miss Creelman shall be reinstated to service and compensated for all wages and other rights suffered as result of her dismissal.

OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, an employee with less than one year of service
with the Carrier, was charged with numerous absences, tar
diness and early departures during a nineteen (19) day period in the Summer of
1971. Subsequent to formal investigation, Claimant was terminated. She seeks
reversal of the disciplinary action and compensation for wages lost while out
of service.

An examination of the entire record in the case demonstrates that Claimant was afforded a fair and impartial investigation as required by the rules.

The Carrier's decision that Claimant was guilty of the offenses charged was based on substantial evidence. In a nineteen (19) day period between July 17 and August 4, 1971, Claimant was either tardy, left early, or absent for an entire day on twelve (12) occasions. The tardiness involved periods from fifteen (15) minutes to two (2) hours and thirty (30) minutes. Early departures involved periods as long as three (3) hours and forty (40) minutes. The record demonstrates that Claimant was without permission would not be tolerated.

Claimant stressed, at the investigation, that the Carrier maintained a very poor air conditioning system at her place of work. However, it did not appear, from a review of the record, that her absences resulted from her physical condition. Under the circumstances, we hold that there is substantial evidence of probative value to support Carrier's finding of Claimant's guilt, and under the circumstances, the Carrier did not abuse its discretion by terminating Claimant's service.







That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this d!.spute are respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act, as approved June 21, 1934:

That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has ,jurisdiction over the dispute involved herein; and








                          By Order of Third Division


ATTEST: ·m
Executive Secretary

Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day o! May, 1973.