NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-20010
Joseph A. Sickles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employee
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Western Pacific Railroad Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-7178)
that:
1, The Carrier violated the rules of the Agreement extant between
the parties when it dismissed Miss L, Creelman from service of the Co.oany,
2. Miss Creelman shall be reinstated to service and compensated for
all wages and other rights suffered as result of her dismissal.
OPINION OF BOARD: Claimant, an employee with less than one year of service
with the Carrier, was charged with numerous absences, tar
diness and early departures during a nineteen (19) day period in the Summer of
1971. Subsequent to formal investigation, Claimant was terminated. She seeks
reversal of the disciplinary action and compensation for wages lost while out
of service.
An examination of the entire record in the case demonstrates that
Claimant was afforded a fair and impartial investigation as required by the
rules.
The Carrier's decision that Claimant was guilty of the offenses charged
was based on substantial evidence. In a nineteen (19) day period between July
17 and August 4, 1971, Claimant was either tardy, left early, or absent for an
entire day on twelve (12) occasions. The tardiness involved periods from fifteen
(15) minutes to two (2) hours and thirty (30) minutes. Early departures involved
periods as long as three (3) hours and forty (40) minutes. The record demonstrates that Claimant was
without permission would not be tolerated.
Claimant stressed, at the investigation, that the Carrier maintained a
very poor air conditioning system at her place of work. However, it did not
appear, from a review of the record, that her absences resulted from her physical
condition. Under the circumstances, we hold that there is substantial evidence
of probative value to support Carrier's finding of Claimant's guilt, and under
the circumstances, the Carrier did not abuse its discretion by terminating Claimant's service.
Award Number 19787 Page 2
Docket Number CL-20010
FINDI1hS: The Third Division of the Adjustment Board, upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds end holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Employee involved in this d!.spute are
respectively Carrier and Employes within the meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as approved June 21,
1934:
That this Division of the Adjustment Hoard has ,jurisdiction over the
dispute involved herein; and
_ That the Agreement was not violated.
p W A $ D
Claim denied.
NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSI7J2PT BOARD
By Order of Third Division
ATTEST: ·m
Executive Secretary
Dated at Chicago, Illinois, this 25th day o! May, 1973.