NATIONAL RAILROAD ADJUSTMENT BOARD
THIRD DIVISION Docket Number CL-19999
Joseph A. Sickles, Referee
(Brotherhood of Railway, Airline and Steamship Clerks,
( Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employes
PARTIES TO DISPUTE:
(The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company
STATEMENT OF CLAIM: Claim of the System Committee of the Brotherhood (GL-7190)
that:
(a) The Carrier violated the Agreement when, beginning December 6,
1971, it relieved Mr. James C. Turner from active service with The Chesapeake
and Ohio Railway Company, and
(b) That Mr. James C. Turner be restored to service with his full
seniority and compensated for all wages and wage equivalents lost for the period
he is held out of service because of the Carrier's wrongful action.
OPINIQN OF BOARD: The Claimant was dismissed from Carrier's service on December
6, 1971 for being insubordinate to his Supervisor on Novem
ber 10, 1971, and for use of profane and abusive language at that same time.
The Board has reviewed the entire record in the case, including the
lengthy transcript of the investigation conducted on November 29 and 30, 1971,
and finds that none of Claimant's substantive procedural rights were violated.
While the investigation was unduly prolonged, and both sides introduced extraneous matters, rathe
facts on a rather uncomplicated charge, we cannot find that the investigation
was conducted in other than a fair and impartial manner.
There was considerable discussion at the hearing concerning subjective:
opinions as to changing concepts of profanity. However, the entire record supports the charge of pro
probative evidence that Claimant was insubordinate and that his language was
abusive. The Carrier cannot be expected to condone the use of "bar-room" language in an office where
Discipline was warranted, but upon the entire record we feel that permanent dismissal was excessive.
and other rights unimpaired, but without compensation for time out of service.
I
Award Number 19795 Page 2
Docket Number CL-19999
rIiFDII::.;: The Third Division of the Adjustm,nnt Hoard; upon the whole record
and all the evidence, finds and holds:
That the parties waived oral hearing;
That the Carrier and the Pmployos involved in this dispute are
respectively Carrier and &aplo;:cs within ilia meaning of the Railway Labor Act,
as ahprcvred June 21, 1931+;
That this. Diviaion of tt.e Ad,ju:4ir.at Hoard has jurisdiction over the
dispute iuvelved herein; and
That the discipline imposed was excessive.
A W A R D
Claim sustained to the extent indicated in Opinion and Findings.
V.`ATICNAL RATTF,OAD ADJUST: _::;T Hf11RD
By Order of Third Division
AT1rST:.
Executive Secretary
Dated
ct
Chicago, Illinois, this
2_.
day of Kay _973.